Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

God of the Paradox

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
76,080
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 14, 2011

What if we solved all our problems this way? Late paying the rent? Just tell your landlord that you paid him with supermoney, which is better than money, but he just can't see it right now.

The paradox and the supernatural are symbiotic. "Beyond" space and time, omniscience, omnibenevolence, omnipotence, omnipresence, freewill, a grand plan, divine intervention, heaven, hell, souls, miracles, and life after death are completely invented concepts that have severe logical problems that are explained away by the word "supernatural", which is also completely made up.

Lightning and rainbows were once obviously supernatural. Those claims failed when they became testable, as will any claim attributed to the supernatural - no matter how obvious they seem to you.

These are good people:
http://www.youtube.com/user/meridianfrost
http://www.youtube.com/user/proportionalresponse
http://www.youtube.com/user/grapplingignorance

My other channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/darkantics

My other "Jesus cameraman" videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcX2A1kNBt4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jvth8SquUIc

Music:

"Whispering Wind" by Zero Project:
http://www.jamendo.com/en/track/682363

"Beat Into Submission" by Tryad:
http://www.jamendo.com/en/track/6573

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,902)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @deathshallcome2u Well let's think about this logically: if there is an all-knowing being out there and you have a "personal relationship" with said being, one would think that you'd be smarter because of it and AT THE VERY LEAST you'd know basic rules of grammar and spelling in your native language by the age of 9.

  • @rnalithe00 yes i can. i can call her or even go see her and ask her in person or look for evidence in her bed that it happened. you have failed. i am smarter than you. im not a know it all dumbass that thinks i need to disprove everyone unlike you. and you know what happens to your kind? they get killed. just look at your so called "great philosophers" who thought they were really smart. they met very violent endings.

  • @deathshallcome2u Your mother had sex with two homeless men at the same time last week. Can you prove that she didn't? No? Well then according to your logic, my claim is correct.

    You're not too bright, are you? You need to learn what a logical fallacy is before you start telling people who are smarter than you that they are wrong.

  • @AllNamesWereOccupied but your saying if i just merely even attepted to try to fix it then it automatically means what i was trying to do is true. oh im going to make a hypothesis and do a test and thats it. i got halfway through it. thats "hard work" enough so it means its true.

  • @AllNamesWereOccupied how do i destroy my own arguement? by quoting a scientist when im a theist? thats just stupid

  • @deathshallcome2u Yes, testing a car makes it safer (If you review what have been tested and fix the problems9.

  • @deathshallcome2u Seriously? You are ridiculous, there is a reason that people like you do not make it into academia.

    Since we are talking about Einstein, he was an agnostic. By claiming him correct you also destroy your own argument.

    Einsteins statement disproves his own theories, the fact that his paper on relativity was several pages long makes it false (Obviously), yet it is the most known mathematical equations in the history of man (Which stretches beyond 6,000 years).

  • @AllNamesWereOccupied if you dont like what i said don't complain to me. complain to einstein. he is only one of the greatest minds of the 20th century.

  • @AllNamesWereOccupied and because they have no value they should not be taken seriously or accepted as fact.

  • @deathshallcome2u "Ever heard of the simplest is usually the most likely the right answer?"

    So you mean that we cannot describe atoms because the equations are to complex for you to understand? The right answer must be the most simple, which is of course that atoms are little balls, nothing else whatsoever. The only thing that makes "atoms" and "atoms" different are how they are labeled.

    The simplest is not the right answer, the right answer is the right answer, be it the most complex.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more