EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS (NIST WTC7)

Do you work in a large office building? Then you should know about this recently discovered flaw in ALL EXISTING BUILDING CODES AND FIRE REGULATIONS that could cause the complete collapse of your office building. For more information on this phenonmenon, please email NIST at wtc@nist.gov

Please do not visit the following sites for more information about what really happened, as they don't agree with NIST's expert and trustworthy analysis:

http://www.ae911truth.org
http://www.stj911.com
http://www.911blogger.com
http://www.corbettreport.com

You have been warned.

• Category

  Education

[ctcole77]

3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

Why won't Kevin Ryan allow ANY of his precious dust samples to be tested by an independent laboratory?

Why won't Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, or Kevin Ryan refute the recent truth seeking professional scientific study of the WTC dust performed by Dr. James Millette?

[pookster78]

.....Hess is clear that once able to get out the building and reflect,there was no explosions and what he experience in wtc 7 was the collapse of wtc1, watch?v=hy5lpp6yADw.

[pookster78]

...Now claim it was used as taper to ignite conventional explosives.

You provide no evidence NIST changes any videos or removed sound,that is just fantasy in your head.NIST were interested in what caused collapse,they were not looking for what happened after,hence why didn't calculate free fall.

Nope,i've never seen the pile "explosions",can you provide a link?

My comments slow at wknd cause I am out having fun.That wknd I was in Ireland getting drunk and having sex with hot women...cont

[pookster78]

...You wrote that FEMA removed 3000 files which were 100% of UA175.You are now changing what you said.NIST withheld files relating to the programming of the WTC7 collapse for good reason.

What evidence have you that USGC now support explosives?

Again,Blanchard does not believe it was explosives,conventional or otherwise.You would know this if you actually read his paper.

Again,Harrit et al do not believe nanothermite was used to cut steel.They realise that claim is silly so...cont

[pookster78]

The data was recorded at LDEO by Columbia Uni.They released it to the public.Their opinion is the "truth" movement have misrepresented it.You can see this yourself in the Graph2 "East-west component seismograms at Palisades,NY from four events at WTC on Sept 11 2001".No significant seismic activity is seen until 15-20secs after the initiation of collapse.Thus,no explosions.

RJ Lee found iron spheres in normal houses dust from Philadelphia,cause these spheres are common to dust....cont

[danp5648]

Explosives are now supported by USGS against earlier reports by the criminals at LDEO. Blanchard demonstrated the requirement whose elements are supported by multiple organizations and at least one scientific paper. Video and witnesses also support these requirements. 1993 bombing by the FBI proves conventional methods do not work. As long as the commentators continue to abuse the conventional method i.e straw-man argument and excuses to not do there job, the criminals will go unpunished.

[danp5648]

most "truthers" have not seen the pile explosions. Have you?

NIST has criminally edited every impact video, criminally cut sounds from WTC 7 falling . (Which reminds me I did find sounds of the collapse.) Which I have add to my next video. I wrote the they withheld 3,000+ files and and only updated there analysis to "free fall" after "Truthers" complained. I big win. They then hijacks "uncontrolled fires" from early cover ups reports there own idea. Subtracted wtc7 witness like Mr. Hess.

[danp5648]

that's right I am not representation LDEO work, I am not only debunking there theory of Air and Crap falling hitting the ground which caused the earth the move 35 miles away i.e the cover up but also hoping for there arrest and that seem pretty clear. There work was categorically incorrect and not in context but also fraudulent. Why not talk on Sundays, buddy? RJ Lee also found the iron spheres. FEMA? The people who removed 3,000 files which was 100% photos of flight 175 because it was a drone

[pookster78]

...Especially when dust studies had already been carried out by a number of groups such as RJ Lee and FEMA.

Lerner Lam of LDEO(Colombia uni) who were the ones recording said this of your claims "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context".Seems pretty clear cut to me.