Boeing 787-Boeing 787 DelayLiner-Boeing 787: B787 The Neverending Plane on Fire!
Uploader Comments (arsenium666)
Top Comments
-
i dont understand why everyone must be either boeing or airbus fans. i'm happy to have both since the added competition benefits US. I love the a380, excellent plane.. I also love the 777 and am sure will love the 787 as well as the a350.
This is a revolutionary plane.. the delay will be worth it.
-
come on guys... arent you sick of A versus B fights all the time? Both planes are GREAT and both companies are kept on their toes to compete and only that way we get a better product... delays? shit happens... but at the end we will see great 787s and 350s gracing the skies... chill and lets enjoy aviation and keep politics aside
Video Responses
All Comments (210)
-
So critical... WASHINGTON — The repair needed to correct a flaw in the fuselage of Boeing Co's new 787 Dreamliner will take 10 to 14 days per plane, a top Boeing executive said. Speaking at an event hosted by Barclays Capital, Pat Shanahan, general manager of airplane programmes for Boeing Commercial Airplanes, said it is not a complex repair, but it takes valuable time as the company races to ramp up production for the long-awaited carbon-composite airplane.
-
Oh look, 787 certified for flight.
-
wow lottoloser was trolling here aswell. Well I hope he watched the whole video and learn that boeing is not doing good
-
i hope it will actually be delivered on the date Boeing has promised. If it does that will be a first. And once they can deliver this jet, they can focus on stretching the 787 and making a 797 that is the 737's replacement.
-
@arsenium666 Yeah, it's also the plane to us an all electrical instead of compressed air system. Which is partly the cause of the fire. I'm sure they'll get it straightened out, and yeah they'll lose some orders. That tends to happen when you build a radically new aircraft.
Is there a particular reason you're hating on Boeing, or you're just in Europe and think you might influence sales?
-
@vidistudi If this is true, it's scary... any sources?
-
Any one that says that this aircraft sucks, is in fact sucking dick.
-
Boeing found out later that if they want lightning protection for the most POWERFUL strikes they had to add so much metal, it would become almost as heavy as an all metal plane. They did a compromise and asked the FAA to lower the lightning safety standards for the fuel tank. A really super powerful lightning strike would be so rare I think they figured it's cheaper to just pay for a few extra plane crashes than increase the fuel consumption if more protective metal was added.
-
@Funfisique the 787 doesn't even compare to the a380 in size, etc
Burning Down d´House:
9th Nombember 2010: the day Smoke appeared in the cabin of a 787 during test flight near Laredo, Texas. Nov. 24, Boeing said it is "developing minor design changes to power distribution panels on the 787 and updates to the systems software that manages and protects power distribution on the airplane."
The repeated 787 delays are "a great disappointment," Shinichiro Ito, CEO of launch customer ANA. ANA is pressing Boeing to clarify whether further delays will occur.
arsenium666 1 year ago 3
Kid´s birth is getting "problematic"...
Wait when it gets older...
LOL
arsenium666 1 year ago
Forensic evidence from the fire damage pinpoints Contactor CK2435505, one of two in the P100 panel, as the source of the ignition. The contactors are electrical control boxes that relay the power from the generators on the engine and distribute it as needed. They open circuits or close as power needs fluctuate. Contactor CK2435505, on top of the panel, was “melted”, while the lower contactor, CK2421501, suffered “extensive fire and smoke damage to backside.”
arsenium666 1 year ago
Fire from the contactor burned a hole between 12 and 15 in. long in the back of the P100 panel, and badly charred the adjacent fuselage insulation blanket material, which effectively did its job in preventing burn-through to the interior of the 787’s primary composite fuselage skin structure.
arsenium666 1 year ago
Boeing may lose $271 million in government payments for satellite launch services if the Defense Contract Audit Agency finds that the company violated federal accounting rules.
Pentagon spokesman Navy Commander Darryn James said that the Defense Contract Audit Agency is currently reviewing whether or not Boeing "improperly billed" the Air Force in a 2006-2008 contract. The billing was for labor, management, quality control and support costs in the Delta IV rocket program.
Boeing=LOSERS
arsenium666 2 years ago