Change Player Size

A Grain of Sand

My reading of "A Grain of Sand," by Robert W. Service (1874-1958). You can find the text of the poem here: http://oldpoetry.com/opoem/... Robert Service was not the first poet to express the ide...  
 

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
281 ratings
Sign in to rate
36,375 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (322)   Options

Loading...
dhannyboy86 (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
that was a very beautiful and philosophical poem. thank you Urgelt
musicnarts22 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Your reading, it reminds me of Dr.Seuss. It was soo good :)
metalgear8871 (4 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
Urgelt! Still love this video, even after nearly 2 years since i discovered it.
waxcoatedbanjo (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
very interesting. Do you play bass guitar? I need one for my band
Urgelt (4 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Er, I'm afraid not.

Odd question to put on a poetry video.
Simsway (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I thank your voice - and you of course. What a gift!
Urgelt (5 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Reductionism is a method of understanding in science.

But it is a trope of science that one cannot understand an ecosystem, nor a universe, solely by dissecting it into its parts. Relationships matter; everything is connected.

Science regards evidence as the sole arbiter of truth. But like any human endeavor, sometimes it needs to be guided into looking in the right places.

I am not alone in regarding native traditions as one of the best places to look.
garland81 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ah. Evidence is crucial at times... but can be a bad behavior. Sometimes just a mere snapshot of current truth against a constantly changing world where there are no guarantees.

I reckon that there are many ways of thinking required to understanding a universe. Reductionism may be one. Relationships another. Seeing flux, balance, and its patterns, perhaps.

But thus, we are limited to language to interpret its understandings... and I doubt words are enough to comprehend it all.
Urgelt (5 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Being a lover of words and language, I wish I could disagree.

But I cannot.

Galileo introduced the idea that mathematics is the language of nature. It's an idea that has long legs. But mathematics is a limited way to grasp nature, too - it would take an unreasonable number of equations and minds to comprehend them to describe it all.

What we are left with is imperfect knowing. Science may be less imperfect than the rest; I think so, anyway. But there will always be mystery.
Urgelt (5 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
And that is a very good thing for poets, I think you'll agree. :-)

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.