My reading of "A Grain of Sand," by Robert W. Service (1874-1958). You can find the text of the poem here:
http://oldpoetry.com/opoem/...
Robert Service was not the first poet to express the ide...
My reading of "A Grain of Sand," by Robert W. Service (1874-1958). You can find the text of the poem here:
Robert Service was not the first poet to express the idea that larger mysteries might be unlocked in a grain of sand, if we had the eyes to see and the brain to comprehend. Here is what William Blake (1757-1827) had to say about it in "Auguries Of Innocence:"
"To see a World in a Grain of Sand And a Heaven in a Wild Flower, Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour."
It's a reductionist sentiment, the same sentiment that underlies much of science: if you can understand a thing from what it is made of, and in turn understand what *that* is made of, and so on, you can grasp the fundamental truths of the universe. Reductionism leads us from whirling galaxies all the way down to the tiny scales of quantum physics.
The space photographs were all created with the Hubble Space Telescope and are in the public domain, courtesy of NASA.
The first beach photograph is the work of Francois Schnell, "Dune and Blue Sky," in the public domain. The second beach photograph is the work of kendiala, "Dune," licensed under the Creative Commons. The final beach photograph is by zenmasterlauren, "Child on the Beach," in the public domain. You can find these photographs by searching on each artist's name at http://www.flickr.com/.
Music is by Mooma, "Entropy," from his album "Herd Forming," licensed under the Creative Commons and available from http://www.mp3.com/.
I don't normally present poetry this short, but I was learning some new software. Consider this video the result of testing.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Reductionism is a method of understanding in science.
But it is a trope of science that one cannot understand an ecosystem, nor a universe, solely by dissecting it into its parts. Relationships matter; everything is connected.
Science regards evidence as the sole arbiter of truth. But like any human endeavor, sometimes it needs to be guided into looking in the right places.
I am not alone in regarding native traditions as one of the best places to look.
Ah. Evidence is crucial at times... but can be a bad behavior. Sometimes just a mere snapshot of current truth against a constantly changing world where there are no guarantees.
I reckon that there are many ways of thinking required to understanding a universe. Reductionism may be one. Relationships another. Seeing flux, balance, and its patterns, perhaps.
But thus, we are limited to language to interpret its understandings... and I doubt words are enough to comprehend it all.
Being a lover of words and language, I wish I could disagree.
But I cannot.
Galileo introduced the idea that mathematics is the language of nature. It's an idea that has long legs. But mathematics is a limited way to grasp nature, too - it would take an unreasonable number of equations and minds to comprehend them to describe it all.
What we are left with is imperfect knowing. Science may be less imperfect than the rest; I think so, anyway. But there will always be mystery.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Odd question to put on a poetry video.
But it is a trope of science that one cannot understand an ecosystem, nor a universe, solely by dissecting it into its parts. Relationships matter; everything is connected.
Science regards evidence as the sole arbiter of truth. But like any human endeavor, sometimes it needs to be guided into looking in the right places.
I am not alone in regarding native traditions as one of the best places to look.
I reckon that there are many ways of thinking required to understanding a universe. Reductionism may be one. Relationships another. Seeing flux, balance, and its patterns, perhaps.
But thus, we are limited to language to interpret its understandings... and I doubt words are enough to comprehend it all.
But I cannot.
Galileo introduced the idea that mathematics is the language of nature. It's an idea that has long legs. But mathematics is a limited way to grasp nature, too - it would take an unreasonable number of equations and minds to comprehend them to describe it all.
What we are left with is imperfect knowing. Science may be less imperfect than the rest; I think so, anyway. But there will always be mystery.