Universe - The Cosmology Quest Pt 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
14,183
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 13, 2011

Watch Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7uT0JuKT8Q
The Cosmology Quest is yet another video that shows how the current model of the big bang is flawed. The electrical model makes so much more sense, so why don't we hear this talked about in main stream media?

Most of the people I come across won't even watch a video like this, claiming that if it had any validity to it at all, the real scientist would have looked at it and evaluated it. In other words, there can't be anything to it, or they would know about it from the experts.

This is just what religious people do, looking to the authorities to tell them what the truth is. This just proves the bible one more time. As it stats, they will be willingly ignorant.

As I always say, the truth always adds up. This video adds up, but, it also holds a key to something else that at first glance may not be as obvious.

What is that?

Free energy!

That's right, if the universe is electrical, then that may well mean that it could provide us with an endless supply of energy. Now we see an actual reason why the electrical model of the universe may be being suppressed.

-------------------------------------------------------------
To watch part 2 of this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7uT0JuKT8Q&feature=relmfu

For new evidence that proves a static and eternal universe see the link below.
Ari Brynjolfsson's Plasma Redshift Cosmology
http://www.plasmaredshift.org/Abstract.html

For more informative videos like this one
http://www.youtube.com/davnxs

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (davnxs)

  • plasmaredshift . org

  • @orrerystar

    Thank you so much for the information. I have added the link to the video information.

  • these debates are healthy for science and it is always good to have alternative theories in cosmology but these guys are WRONG

  • @boxingnews247

    Oh really. How can someone be wrong for just being truthful? Because they are just telling it like it is, they're wrong? What world do you live in? How can you say they're wrong and not even offer an explanation to what they are wrong about? All I hear them saying is that what they are seeing doesn't make sense according the model we us, but there it is, it's like this! You are so typical of those that think evolution is a fact! So what are they WRONG about?

  • @davnxs See it is people like you who are very narrow minded and are unable to make informed decisions given the facts. I do not believe in evolution as i am a Christian - so what is your point?? I am talking about their observations and the conclusions they draw from it... they are clearly wrong.

  • @boxingnews247 I guess I don't understand what I is you are saying they are wrong about? These are people that unlike most, are just trying to be honest about what they are seeing. These are the people that evolutionist usually harass and deny telescope time to because they are bucking the big bang theory. Maybe you should watch part 2, and if you're really willing to think outside of the box watch Thunderbolts. I'm sorry for assuming you were an evolutionist.

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • While I appreciated a fresh and interesting view of the current "steady state" P.O.V., I didn't feel it addresses the many other lines of evidence such as measuring the rate of expansion using the light of a special type of super nova to derive distance rather than just red shift.

  • Great vid!

    This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!

    This theory is based on two postulates

    1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself

    2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!

  • a big bang implies something from nothing which is the main flaw for me. EMC2 hasnt been renounced thus far, so no, the universe wasnt suddenly brought into being from a nothing, there has to be something, to get something, you dont get something from nothing! it always was, we are in the mind of the infinite! WE CAN NEVER KNOW THE INFINITE MIND!

  • @boxingnews247 "I am a christian". there you go, question answered. You, as a dogmatic subscriber, are mired in your own ignorance. you base your belief on a metaphorical book! you think the wolrd was literally created in 7 days! Im not disputing the fact of a CREATOR, but your VERSION of this GOD is flawed. I believe in function beneath form but not a wrathful abrahamic god!! YOU are the one needs to widen your horizon!

  • Religionfags love the big bang theory because they think that implies a God.. lol Of course then they proceed to not believe in evolution.

  • @boxingnews247

    Then you have a hypothesis based based on faith; which equals no evidence.

  • @wellpastcaring Evolution clearly is part of life and nature but i do not believe we humans have come about as a result of evolution - this comes down to faith.

  • @boxingnews247 You say, "I do not believe in evolution as i am a Christian." Does this mean that you would have to stop being a Christian if you did believe in evolution? If God exists then He doesn't need to follow your rules. Evolutionary principles obviously work, since animal breeders have been using them for centuries. So why can't evolution work in the natural world?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more