Love, Belief, and Neurobiology of Attachment

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,659
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 12, 2008

In this Loma Linda video, Paul J. Zak, founding director of the Center for Neuroeconomics Studies at Claremont Graduate University, gives a scientific twist on the topics of attachment and trust. By looking into the geographical and biological aspects of human trust, Zak presents an engaging conversation into how trust affects our behaviors, from our social interactions with strangers to peoples relationships with God and religion.

Category:

Education

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 8 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.

  • How can you base a thesis on something that hasn't been definitively proven.While it's great to have an open mind and speculate, but it's offense to relay conjectures in attempts to sway the public.Cohesion exemplified through a great many models and ties into natural selection which accounts for prevailing state of the human species(for example) Until sufficiently proven, the conclusion or thesis of this talk is balderdash. Outcomes of all types are predicated or based upon biological origins.

  • Its very interesting video.

  • It is great learning from these video.

  • @conzatorium

    I know its 1 year late, BUT, well, if you WANT to trust someone, then there is prolly oxytocin or other features making you inclined to think so, i guess thats the problem around it, when people would have much better outcomes IF they were inclined to trust vs the postulated state of non-trust.

  • @VinkoRajic u'r a moron

  • I am maybe the only really telepathic person in the world. You should not think that I could be Schizophrenic.

    I can exchange voice, video, smell, people can move small move muscles on my body from distance and much more.

    Maybe some of Neurologist or scientist

    could help me or is maybe interesting to make research on my phenomena.

  • @light4rmLove we can maintain innocence and use good judgement at the same time, can't we. My objection is to the conclusion he jumped to.

  • @Lubziw perhaps trusting people are less corrupt - and those less trusting have lost their "innocence" due to negative life experiences (a cup half empty or half full theory). You have a point; but it's quite vague and generalising. There are many trusting carefree individuals who give the benefit of the doubt - and perhaps don't allow the "doubt" part to negatively imprint their life......

  • great man

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more