For the refutation of the allegation made by haters of Islam with regards to the Codex of Ibn Musud see this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W08vkn...
For refutations of some of the sources used by Ahmadsqurand3 on his website see this website:
http://www.islamic-awareness.org/
For a look at his website along with the Resource List see:
http://inthenameofallah.org/quran.html
Things not said in the video:
Ahmadsquran3 says in his article(see above) that the first Surah 1 is patterned after the Lord's Prayer found in the NT. Once again Ahmadsquran3 needs to read the NT again. There are 7 verses in Surah 1, yet in Matthew chapter 6:9-13 we find that it is not 7 verses but actually 5. Also in Luke we have a SHORTER version of this prayer(only 3 verses.) So where does Ahmadsquran3 get this information from? HE IS JUST COUNTING LINES IN THE TEXT. He is ignoring the concept of VERSES and counting lines. So hence if he ONLY uses the Lord's prayer in Luke's gospel it is "7" lines, yet in Matthew's it is "11/12", depending the version. So this is how Ahmadsquran3 gets this insane concept that Muhammad was patterning Sura 1 after the Lord's Prayer. GIVE ME A BREAK.
Muhammad Asad on Surah 1:
"'The Opening' was one of earliest revelations bestowed upon the Prophet. Some authorities(for instance, 'Ali ibn ibi Talib' were even of the opinion that it was the first revelation; but this view is contradicted by authentic Traditions quoted by both Bukhari and Muslim, which unmisitakably, show that the first five verses of Surah 96 ("the Germ-Cell") constituted the beginning of revelation. It is probable, however, that where as the earlier revelations consisted of only a few verses each, "the opening" was the first Surah revealed to the Prophet in its entirety at one time; and this would explain the view held by Ali."
So, AhmadsQuran3 got something wrong? Does that mean he's wrong about everything else he exposes about Islam? If so, what else did he get wrong about Islam?
RammatRamzi 4 months ago
I think you should blame Muhammad's god allah for the wrong choice of words which have not only confused the followers but also the Islamic clerics who still argue amonst themselves as to which interpretation is right.
Didn't allah know that this was coming? Why didn't he chose a better way to explain his deity?
The book of Islam is not the word of the GOOD AND HOLY God!
It's content clearly comes from a dark source...it promotes hatred and wars and segregation to Satan's joy!!!
Mostuse 8 months ago
You seem to not be in touch with reality
The chapter is said to be modeled after, since when does modeled after mean exactly duplicated, youre picking nits
So GIVE ME A BREAK
Now can you provide original korans or hadiths ? The ORIGINALS !
DebateFaith 1 year ago