Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Noah's Ark( Arca di Noè)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
44,800
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 10, 2010

Noah's Ark Is (still) In Turkey - (Armenia)

Share This Site by Dan Eden for viewzone

Why is this not a BIG story?

I'm often amazed at our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are hungry for this information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate these facts seem to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is especially true when it comes to our ancient human history.

I won't hold you in suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been found. It's real. I'll describe the evidence in some detail and end with the historical and religious implications.

How it was discovered

In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger than a football field, stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude of 6,300 feet near the Turkish border with Iran.

Capt. Durupinar was familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its association with Mount Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any conclusions. The region was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small villages. No previous reports of an object this odd had been made before. So he forwarded the photographic negative to a famous aerial photography expert named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio State University.

Brandenburger was responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases during the Kennedy era from reconnaissance photos, and after carefully studying the photo, he concluded: "I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photo."

In 1960 the picture [above] was published in LIFE magazine under the heading of Noahs Ark? That same year a group of Americans accompanied Capt. Durupinar to the site for a day and a half. They were expecting to find artifacts on the surface or something that would be unquestionably related to a ship of some kind. They did some digging in the area but found nothing conclusive and announced to the anxiously waiting world that it appeared to be a natural formation.

Most of the global media turned away from the find and it became a non-story.

In 1977 Ron Wyatt visited the site. Obtaining official permission, Ron and others conducted more thorough research over a period of several years. They used metal detection surveys, subsurface radar scans, and chemical analysis -- real science -- and their findings were startling. The evidence was undeniable. This was the Ark of Noah.

#1 -- the Visual Evidence

The first part of the survey was to examine the object and take its measurements. The shape looked like hull of a ship. One end was pointed as you would expect from bow [below: D] and the opposite end was blunt like a stern. The distance from bow to stern was 515 feet, or exactly 300 Egyptian cubits. The average width was 50 cubits. These were the exact measurements mentioned in the Bible. Artifacts retrieved from the Ark

Using the GPR, Ron Wyatt discovered an open cavity on the starboard side. He used an improvised drill to make core sample inside this cavity and retrieved several very interesting objects. Below you can see the artifacts which were sent for laboratory analysis. On the left is the bore hole [see below], followed by what turned out to be petrified animal dung, then a petrified antler and lastly a piece of cat hair.

Even more amazing artifacts were found

Perhaps the most significant find from the Ark itself is a piece of petrified wood. When this was first found it appeared to be a large beam. But upon closer examination it is actually three pieces of plank that have been laminated together with some kind of organic glue! This is the same technology used in modern plywood. Lamination makes the total strength of the wood much greater than the combined strength of the pieces. This suggests a knowledge of construction far beyond anything we knew existed in the ancient world.In Genesis 6:14, God told Noah to "make yourself an ark of gopher wood."

"Gopher wood" is a misreading and scribal error. "Kopher" wood is correct and means wood (any wood) that is covered with Kopher. Kopher is bitumen. In the Genesis text (6:14), the context is clear. The GPR wood used, (a scribal error) is to be covered in KPR. G and K in Hebrew are so similar that inexperienced Hebrew "scholars," such as those translating the King James Version of the Bible, could have been prone to such errors, indeed, they made many such errors.

Acts 7: 45 & Hebrews 4: 8 are classic examples of such scribal errors

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (nano63a)

  • The Ark storys not a bible story its part of the much older Sumerian mythology that was hijacked by the later Jewish/Christian mythology so any real facts are buried over many 1000s of years...

    over the last 17000yrs 24million sq km has been lost to the sea and as most ancient civilizations/populations were on the coasts stories of ancient flooding is not really surprising

  • @wildfire160 You did your Homework.The old Noah was Ziusudra king of Shuruppak.The animals were DNA.

  • Take into consideration; the ark too small to contain even a fraction of two pairs of every animal. most are predatory and would eat the rest of the animals, and don't forget about all that animal poo cleaning and feeding.. the logistics of it all!!.. and who was left to repopulate the planet? think about it you idiots!! it would take more than 6 super tankers to haul all of those pairs of species!

  • @scoopyex Little room for DNA.Peace.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Il Pianeta degli Dei 1a Puntata
see all

All Comments (144)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nano63a

    Interesting theory but i think you're looking into things far too deeply. I really don't think it's anything quite so spectacular, it's far more plausible that it's just a tale that had some origin in truth in that a large area of localised flooding occurred which to the people of that time would appeared to have been 'worldwide'.

  • @jamespg1993

    It's just a natural rock formation & natural rock formations are found on all mountain ranges by default, being a mountain & all that. This is also Mt Tendurek, not Mt Ararat.

  • @wildfire160 but why is the location at the place the bible say it is ?

  • @carlosamigosAUS About 10985 BC It's a methaphor for saving the species on planet Earth.We're doing the same now we stored 1000's of dna species ,plants animals and humans for the same reason,the reset is close.Let's go for another round.Peace.We are a colony a humanoid colony,with different races from different places unifide in a DNA code,this is a LAB.Good research.

  • @nano63a Then what, he beamed it up to gods heaven lab and turned the dna back into living animals? Or Noah had his own stem cells to inject the DNA into? And this was how many thousands of years ago?

  • @SuperDjbam Ziusudra stored DNA not living animals.Just like we're doing today at the Svalbard in Norway.Peace.

  • @scoopyex

    You dont have to expect a literal and 100% confirmation of every species being take aboard, if it did happen it was what, 3000 years ago? but a big flood is mentioned in many religions and histories written at the time. dont about dogs but wolves are akin to dogs are more than 100 years old....as are dogs indeed...

  • ROFLMAO !

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more