God vs Infinity (Part 1)

My channel has, of late, been plagued by Christians trying to extol the virtues of their God, in defence of various things that is wrong about Christianity or specifically creationism or literalism of the bible.

Their latest attempt is to say that their God gave humans free will and yet they sinned against God's will. Well he isn't a very good God if he can't perform a paradox, can he? Any infinite God worth his salt should be able to do this.

These series of videos are my musings about God and infinity and how at the end of the day the Christian God is at best a childish shadow of a dot against the majesty that is the Infinite God

Category:

Education

Tags:

• God
• Infinite
• Adam
• Eve
• Enoch
• Genesis
• Great
• Flood
• Nephalim
• Grigori
• editing
• bible
• goddess
• infinity
• Christian
• childish

[Kreneep1052]

The Earth is NOT the CENTER of the Universe

[xhemexx]

OFFCOURSE GOD IS INFINITE. Othewise God wouldn't be God. Why would anyone worship someone or something that is not infinite. So 1000 percent God is Infinite

[VarvaraBell]

@RichAnderson114 Great quote, words to take in from a great mind.

[RichAnderson114]

@VarvaraBell "I am not an atheist. I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how." - Albert Einstein

[VarvaraBell]

@RichAnderson114 It's like if I dropped a penny in your hand and said that's our entire universe every star, every galaxy and now look out to all that is around it and the sky above. That is a real visualization of the sheer size or lack of size of what's really going on. Zoom into matter and the solid turns into spheres and orbits again. If you were the nucleus of an atom your electron would be orbiting you 1 km out, Are we really big or atomically small?

[VarvaraBell]

@RichAnderson114 I'm not sure, I guess I have some characteristics of it, but I surely respect people who admit it's just not possible to know all and have all the answers. Another mathematical principle, the number of stars and galaxies times the size of the universe is a mathimatical number so high, an odd so big, That to claim we know it all and have figured it all out against those mathematics is nonsense. When we can't even fly out into it further than a fraction 0.

[RichAnderson114]

@VarvaraBell I would venture a guess that you are agnostic? Sorry if I'm wrong, I realise guessing at that is a dangerous thing in these days. I relate most closely with Agnosticism only because they seem to be the only group with enough common sense to admit that they don't know what is unknown. I do like your point very much, as the point that the value 0 exists even though there is no evidence of such, simply because it exists in our consciousness.

[VarvaraBell]

@RichAnderson114 Now that I remember, the fossil record shows a sundden explosion of life when before this it was nothing much at all. This would support the idea on multiple living organisms at the same time. Funny that science is only possible because consciousness exists, this leads to the measurement problem, uncertainty principle in quantum physics, the instrument used to measure, observe, effects the result. wether it is human consciousness or a pyhsical tool resulting from consciousness

[RichAnderson114]

@VarvaraBell What's more. If someone else came up with something that made more sense to me I wouldn't be so brainwashed or in love with the idea I have to abandon it completely and adopt a different philosophy. I stress the word philosophy because neither abio, creationism, ID, or any other operating theory about how life began is science.

[RichAnderson114]

@VarvaraBell There is only one truth, and sometimes we are just better off admitting that we have no clue what it is than pretending we do and beating each other up over it. Personally, I think it's far more likely that there was a major global event (I would say God) that brought on multiple living organisms at the same time, if only because of the statistical probability of survival. My evidence? None. Can I test it? Nope. And that is why it is a belief that anyone can agree or disagree with.