The Translation of Easter
Top Comments
All Comments (54)
-
@robycop3 Robby, the commentary is not God inspired. You are wrong once again. The King James is the inerrant word of God and there is nothing you can make up or fictionalize that will change that. Judgment is coming soon for those that distort the word. You best repent.
-
@tgambill Yes, Easter was introduced by Constantine's missionaries, who got it from some Germanic tribes, and worked the story of Jesus' resurrection into it. Easter did NOT exist when Luke wrote the letter that was to become the Book of Acts, so the use of "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is a goof. (BTW, the KJV translators believed that Easter and Christmas were the two holiest days of the year, as is seen in their commentary within the AV 1611,)
-
Great video!
-
@robycop3 You didn't read what I wrote. You are making ifs, coulds, maybe's......and this proves nothing but movement of words.
-
@robycop3 ...(Continued) so the reference in John 18:28 MUST be to the special meals of unleavened bread eaten all week long. Passover IS indeed a week long by GOD'S OWN DECLARATION. Therefore, Herod busted Peter during PASSOVER. Easter did not then exist, and even if it had then existed, no orthodox JEW woulda observed it.
-
@tgambill I'll prove U wrong by your own KJV right here... Ezekiel 45:21In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have THE PASSOVER, A FEAST OF SEVEN DAYS; unleavened bread shall be eaten.
John 18:28Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was early; and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled; but that they might EAT THE PASSOVER. Now, the paschal lamb had already been eaten...(continued)
-
@samuelamos1 Well, a common cold useta be called "catarrh" within the lifetimes of our oldest citizens, but how many younger people know what catarrh means, or use that word? The interchangeability of Easter and passover was obsolete by the time the KJV was made.
-
@samuelamos1 No, "Easter" in the KJV is NOT correct. It has NOT been "demonstrated" correct. EASTER DID NOT EXIST when Luke wrote Acts, and the translation should reflect LUKE'S thoughts, not those of the translator. "Easter is NOT accurate, no matter how many excuses one invents trying to defend it. And neither is the KJVO myth in general. There's not one quark of the slightest implication for the KJVO myth, even in the KJV itself.
-
@tgambill Amen.
-
Respond to this video... Jesuits even smell bad.....
Nice!
excatholics 4 years ago 6
Amazing video- proves conclusively that God had his hand on the KJV and that Easter is the correct translation.
Jerry4America 3 years ago 3