Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Translation of Easter

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,857
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 25, 2008

EASTER, OR PASSOVER?
- http://www.av1611.org/kjv/easter2.html
By Jack A. Moorman

DayStar Publishing
http://www.daystarpublishing.org
http://samgipp.org

The Answer Book by Dr. Sam Gipp
http://www.samgipp.com/answer/gipp_answer_index.html

We Are Americans
1st Chapter Excerpt
By Dr. Samuel C. Gipp
http://biblebelievers.com/gipp_we_americans.html.

Every thing you wanted to know about the modern translation issue -
http://www.youtube.com/my_videos?pi=0&ps=20&sf=added&sa=0&sq=....

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Nice!

  • Amazing video- proves conclusively that God had his hand on the KJV and that Easter is the correct translation.

see all

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @robycop3 Robby, the commentary is not God inspired.  You are wrong once again. The King James is the inerrant word of God and there is nothing you can make up or fictionalize that will change that. Judgment is coming soon for those that distort the word. You best repent.

  • @tgambill Yes, Easter was introduced by Constantine's missionaries, who got it from some Germanic tribes, and worked the story of Jesus' resurrection into it. Easter did NOT exist when Luke wrote the letter that was to become the Book of Acts, so the use of "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is a goof. (BTW, the KJV translators believed that Easter and Christmas were the two holiest days of the year, as is seen in their commentary within the AV 1611,)

  • Great video!

  • @robycop3 You didn't read what I wrote. You are making ifs, coulds, maybe's......and this proves nothing but movement of words.

  • @robycop3 ...(Continued) so the reference in John 18:28 MUST be to the special meals of unleavened bread eaten all week long. Passover IS indeed a week long by GOD'S OWN DECLARATION. Therefore, Herod busted Peter during PASSOVER. Easter did not then exist, and even if it had then existed, no orthodox JEW woulda observed it.

  • @tgambill I'll prove U wrong by your own KJV right here... Ezekiel 45:21In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have THE PASSOVER, A FEAST OF SEVEN DAYS; unleavened bread shall be eaten.

    John 18:28Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was early; and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled; but that they might EAT THE PASSOVER. Now, the paschal lamb had already been eaten...(continued)

  • @samuelamos1 Well, a common cold useta be called "catarrh" within the lifetimes of our oldest citizens, but how many younger people know what catarrh means, or use that word? The interchangeability of Easter and passover was obsolete by the time the KJV was made.

  • @samuelamos1 No, "Easter" in the KJV is NOT correct. It has NOT been "demonstrated" correct. EASTER DID NOT EXIST when Luke wrote Acts, and the translation should reflect LUKE'S thoughts, not those of the translator. "Easter is NOT accurate, no matter how many excuses one invents trying to defend it. And neither is the KJVO myth in general. There's not one quark of the slightest implication for the KJVO myth, even in the KJV itself.

  • @tgambill Amen.

  • Respond to this video... Jesuits even smell bad.....

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more