Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

2001 Mustang GT(stock) vs. supercharged ford lightning

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
12,574
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 29, 2007

My stock 01' Mustang at KCIR on May 29 2007. wanted to get a baseline to see what the car would do. it was 65 degrees with 90% humidity.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • lightnings are way faster than stock gts

  • if ur friends s/c cobra lost to the lightning than he needs to learn how to drive

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @randumbuller mfr claim its 305. actual dynos prove its understated and actual is 320.

  • @jaeshuan1 the mach 1 is 305 sir.

  • fuck that man !!! GT'S ALL THE WAY!!! no lightning is going to beat a 99-04 gt....no sir!!!

  • shoker, manual transmission gt burns an automatic lightning.

  • the 98 gt sucked, it has the non PI heads and manifold.

  • thats not a mach1, thats not a shaker hood.

  • The mach1 is 320hp stock, the 2001 GT is 260 stock, the lightning is 390 and has a ton of body weight and an automatic transmission. Ive smoked lightnings in an SVT contour, and thats a low 15 second car. The stock '01 GT runs anywhere from a 13.85 to a 14.2 depending on what sources ET's you use.

  • Thanks for the info

  • I have an 03 Lightning. Stock. I ran 13.8 and 13.9 @ 99mph and 100 mph in the 1/4 mile back to back. From a digg the lightning is quick. From highway speeds it is not the same beast. Aerodynamics of a brick. I try not to run anyone from a roll.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more