A Whale of a Problem for Evolutionists
Top Comments
All Comments (1,143)
-
@foxlake02 aka dingbatclaire, HAR HAR HAR HAR You are too stupid to be able to hurt anyone's feelings. If you and you sock sister odi, had just disappeared you would be having all your secret socks exposed. HAR HAR HAR HAR you are one dumb bitch Claire.
PWNED
-
@DishrackDoofus I see your trolling me everywhere I go now. I must have really hurt your e-feelings.
-
Oooh goodie, another religion vs evolution debate. See I don't go to actual religious sites and slag 'em off. But seeing as places like this throw it open for us all to rant at each other. I'd like to say, sorry folks. Religion doesn't work as well as it used to anymore. It was used to keep people in line with fear of the unknown.
-
@GoodScienceForYou "I find it funny that I posted the equation with the missing "/" and AlanCFA (certified f###ing a##hole) goes ballistic. I posted it that way so it would force him to go look it up"
That is a blatant lie. You could not perform high school algebra. Your statement that energy accelerated = mass is also ludicrous but you will either not admit to that being wrong or you will pretend that you stated that deliberately. You are a lying idiot, not a scientist.
-
@GSFY "This math is from a physicist's article" No it isn't You cited the mass-energy article in Wikipedia and no such equation appears. It shows: E = m'('distance'2/'time'2)'; hence the term "mass–energy equivalence"
and THAT CANNOT be algebraically manipulated to c =time^2 * distance^2
The part inside the parentheses is equiv to c^2, so they actually show c^2 = (dist'2/'time'2)
Show me a physicist who thinks that is c =time^2 * dist^2
You don't know high school algebra you MORON!
@GSFY "You are an Evotard, who thinks that theory is your Evodelusional "Gospel". It is your religion" It makes it easier for you to think that the TOE is a religion, but it is not. If the term "evotard" means those that understand high school algebra, count me in and you out. You botched simple algebra calculations, blamed it on the article you read, and took no responsibility for your failure to do math the average 14-year old can handle; all in an attempt to prove another stupid idea
AlanCFA 11 months ago 7
@GoodScienceForYou "Are you nuts or just forgot to look at evidence?"
YOU NEVER look at evidence. You simply DENY IT. You are a fraud, a loser, and a moron.
AlanCFA 1 year ago 7