Lord Monckton Vs. Greenpeace: On The Streets - Dropping InfoBombs - ClimateGate Global Warming Hoax

Action On The Streets:

Lord Christopher Monckton takes Green Peace to task on the many different levels of corruption, deceit, and true weather occurrences. He absolutely floors them, pay attention and you may learn too. As pointed out by a viewer, this vid just proves that it(Global Warming) is really a religion. Climatology the new world church (of the sheeple).

●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
The information provided by the ClimateGate hackers (WIN) have given us in the Truth movement an very unique moment that we must seize upon. The scandal/hoax/blatant lie that is Global Warming does involve nearly every corporation, bank, shadow entity, etc. with whom we are in battle. We must follow the information to the corners of the earth, bark up every tree and dig up every scrap available. It is up to us to show how far-reaching and malicious the true motives are. We all know that the media will pick a fall guy and allow this to all blow away if we do not push from all sides. PLEASE spread the information, research for yourself. We are the reason the Truth is here, and we will be the reason the Truth will triumph.

●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑۩۩๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬● http://www.youtube.com/user/HorseofPa... http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/

• Category

  Education

[CatholicusRomanus]

That woman is dumbed like a beetle - people in Europe in general belong to the dumbest of all, because they COULD inform themselves if they wished, but they rather belong to some group that gives them a pretty, and nice feeling, they feel as though they're doing something good - oooh... they're so cute - IT'S RIDICULOUS - USA and Europe are populated by little babies in diapers, who will ALWAYS look to MEDIA and GOVERNMENTS to know what to think... it's embarrasing

[Major Wedgie]

Lord Monckton is a petty charlatan and that woman just walked into his trap.

Pick any scientific body and start reading.

[jamierock7]

Quite the opposite, Al Gore is planning to make billions off this nonsense.

[jamierock7]

All of it except for the spelling of his name in the end credits.

[jamierock7]

And this based on your extensive research or did you just simple read that off a Greenpeace pamflet that came with your membership card.

[jamierock7]

1) I'll answer your question with a question: What's Al Gore's and David Suzuki's credentials? Why won't they meet him in a debate on the subject?

2) Have You checked the scientific data of the climatologist that support the theory of man made climate change? I find it ironic that you have selected the name OneNewAtheist as your youtube name yet you sure have a lot of blind faith when it comes to the climate change debate. Your argument is based on personal attacks on Monckton, nothing more.

[OneNewAtheist]

1) He has a degree in .. what ... Statistical Analysis? Statistics-ology? From where?

2) What study? Where's the source so that we can verify the methods used and results produced?

Last point -- HE used mathematical linear regression models? Do you really buy that? His background in applied mathematics is, well, non-existent.

Why is this brain trust of a human being not publishing his findings in respected, peer-reviewed scientific journals? I know why not. Obviously, you do not.

[jamierock7]

I would like to answer each of your points on at a time:

1) Monckton has never claimed to be a climatetologist, he states even in the video that he is a statistician.

2) The U.N. commissioned the study and financed it, Monckton is correct.

last point: Monckton states in this video he used mathematical linear regression models from data collected from weather satelites as well as from data from the University of Illinois. Check out Dr. Richard Lindzen of M.I.T, him and Monckton seem to agree.

[OneNewAtheist]

1) His dishonesty and lack of academic credentials are related to his credibility.

2) His first claim was that the U.N., in it's calculations, showed that in the last twenty years we could have not had any effect on the climate. THE U.N.??? Is that a group of Climatologists? No. Was there a scientific study conducted by "The U.N."? No. The U.N. doesn't conduct scientific research.

Notice that he doesn't provide a source for this ridiculous claim. Also, he's not asking a Climatologist.

[jamierock7]

I guess that's how you made your conclusion of "shrinking" glaciers by not looking at the data?? 97% of climatologists agree that man made CO2 is causing global warming?!? Most of these "climatologists" no longer call it global warming anymore due to a cooling of our planet over the last 20 years, they call it "Climate Change"!! You appear to be ignorant and out of touch to the environmental propoganda you're trying to sell. By the way 92.86% of statistics are made up on the spot.