Uploaded by SquatchInc on Feb 15, 2010
We take a close look at some recent "research" presented on youtube by Thefirstbillyjack. The video makes the case that when a researcher claims "undeniable" evidence is found, without producing corroborating evidence, it is a "jumping the shark"' moment.
Some will claim this is a personal attack, or Bigfoot politics. Neither would be correct. It is an attempt to point out serious flaws in how some conduct and portray their research. Presenting undeniable Bigfoot evidence, without undeniable proof, is one of the many reasons BF Research is scoffed at and made fun of by the scientific community along with a vast portion of the general public, which are both crucial pieces in helping us solve this mystery.
Our research is not perfect or scientifically correct most of the time, but if it's nothing else, it is honest.
If or when evidence is found and there is even the smallest likelihood that points to something rather than Bigfoot, it can not be labeled as Bigfoot evidence. If one thinks they are finding BF evidence, then it's extremely important to test that theory in some manner. Simply videographing structures or formations and then walking away, will never be considered evidence of Bigfoot until data shows the creatures are actually causing the phenomenon.
Thefirstbillyjack's youtube page can be found here..
http://www.youtub.com/user/thefirstbillyjack
If you are not familiar with his research you can go to his channel to learn more. Please, do not attack Thefirstbillyjack by making personal remarks towards him. We don't condone that type of behavior. If you think he's doing a great job tell him that. If you think his research could be better, tell him that too, but please be civil about it. Nasty remarks aren't going to get the matter resolved. He's not out there trying to hoax anything that we know of. His major flaw is how he presents and labels evidence. We commend his desire and passion for getting out in the field, but we simply can no longer condone his presentation of evidence.
-
24 likes, 16 dislikes
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (SquatchInc)
All Comments (59)
-
why would anyone spend so much energy critiqueing the claims of the obviously mentally challenged. 99% of these bigfoot researchers are wack job morons who see a squatch behind every tree. well they don't really see it. But they know it is there because bigfeet are extremely good at hiding. and the best evidence that they are there is that you can't see them.
cunnidvd 1 month ago
-
@fasanotampa Tim Fasano, you have been caught fabricating evidence and hoaxing multiple times. You work with Tom Biscardi. You have a sketchy past. You have posted naked pictures of yourself on the internet. You have a criminal record that includes domestic abuse. You can't pay your bills. You were dating Julianne Lea when she died mysteriously. You of all people are going to post videos about some right-winger? Give me a break! Please get yourself the help you need.
gene4523 7 months ago
-
Hay guys...Nice video of this poor man who is hurting nobody by what he does...I am sure the Fonz would think this is 'cool.' Watch my channel over the next few weeks, many things will be laid bare about a right-wing Rush loving dude who has malice in his heart...It is not to late to say your sorry...you know who I am, and what I am talking about. The jig is up buddy.
fasanotampa 1 year ago
-
By all means please.... Bash that guy as much as you can!
msawbe 1 year ago
-
Good video, excellent points! I corrected this buffoon the very first time he tried to tell us his porqupine was a sasquatch. I did it politely and he blocks me! I believe thefirstbillyjack is playing the part of a wacko researcher to make the public believe it's just a persuit for self-deceiving fools. Look at tampa tim, joeblack and Jaime Avalos. Their kooky nonsense is done to confuse the public about the reality of bigfoot.
kapacon 1 year ago
-
OK it's a f*ckin' porqupine, if you can't tell that then you need to have you eyes checked. I cant believe this cityboy thefirstbillyjack is thinking this is a babboon.
Also those broken down trees are VERY common.
P.S. I live on a 125 acre ranch with 50+ acres of it being woods, and im a hunter and fisherman, so I know whether or not something is "man-made" or not.
ibeprofin 1 year ago
-
I applaud your videos squatchinc.... people who put out videos like this deserve to get called out on their claims..... you arent bashing anyone... but he is putting out videos to the public and making all kinds of ridiculous claims in the name of research... and he NEEDS to be CORRECTED on his disgraceful, poor research. Thank you again for taking the time to point out his many mistakes and flaws...
emilshere 1 year ago
-
Ok, initially I slammed you guys for giving TFBJ so much crap. However, he and Fasanotampa keep putting out the same crazy stuff. You'd think that they'd be a bit more cautious about their postings. One is also calling woodpeckers a bigfoot. Another calling a vine a python and also coyotes and deer calls bigfoot. They block people that correct them. And finally Ed has apparently released yet another tree mammal.
BFResearchSE 1 year ago
-
NONE of you would ever even be able to present 100 % undeniable evidence even if you found it, some form of government agency would stop you, I would bet my life on that. The 2 jack-asses from my state here in Georgia who hoaxed the dead bigfoot a while back would have been haulted also, that is IF the gov. actually thought they were serious, and not just the immature fools they really were. Good luck and I do think sasquatch is real, but 100 % undeniable evidence will be taken by the gov.
EducatedRebellion101 2 years ago
-
the post i posted wasnt from Abe i dont have anything to do with MNBTR other than podcast but he is still the Elusive One
cslademonk 2 years ago
9:24
Pt.2 Jumping The Shark & Bigfoot Researchby SquatchInc1,525 views
4:52
Sanger Paranormal Society Bigfoot Investigationby TheMufonman1,539 views
7:37
Bigfoot signs, or not?by nate24ish538 views
0:26
BEAST OF GUM HILL Woodbooger (Bigfoot video)by erikusmaximus161,889 views
8:51
FIRST MOGOLLON MONSTER BIGFOOT OUTING FOR 2010by SUSANFARNS2,914 views
5:58
Border Bigfoot: night ops 2by desertbigfootguy682 views
5:55
Maine Tree Creature - Unknown Primate ( Debunked )by SquatchInc4,714 views
0:31
Elusive Bigfoot Footage!by SkullDefiler21,583 views
5:39
The Face of BigFootby joebblack196316,186 views
1:18
unknown animal crossing riverby jdoyon12455,853 views
8:37
Bigfoot Expedition CC1009 Part 1by SquatchInc4,278 views
1:32
Thefirstbillyjack dogman viocesby 73roadrunner1452 views
2:47
The Caveby fasanotampa3,424 views
8:59
Episode 128: Bigfoot Discovery Projectby BigfootMuseum770 views
1:00
Scariest Unknown creature found in Spainby yesar03378,146 views
2:52
Bigfoot footage from the Applachiansby darkwinglh85,614 views
2:08
REAL An actual recording of Bigfoot crying. Recorded on the Rosebud.by cidupeska69,548 views
1:17
Disturbing Photos Of An Unknown Small Creature!by HogNoseFilms74,815 views
0:16
Bigfoot Blinks?by Ricky540i2,842 views
- Loading more suggestions...
I think people see quite clearly what is going on here. :)
Refute the claims.
60 Hours.
SquatchInc 2 years ago
It has been over 48 hours now, we get the point that you think we are "bashing" Ed. We have laid out critical flaws in what he perceives as research. At some point you are going to have to address those. Either now or later.
Undeniable Proof - Confirmation Bias - Baboons - Unknown Primates. Those are the issues.
SquatchInc 2 years ago