Global Warming Debate - Philip Stott, part 6 of 10

Stott can flat out debate.

I forgot to mention that he won the argument for the other side. :P

"This is a political CRISIS..." :P

I thought that he did pretty well. He did begin with flattery, and he did scare me in the middle, but he finally made his point.

Stott is fantastic. He demonstrates common sense, wit, and knowledge. Him and Crichton have it right. Our priorities are absolutely backwards.

I like this guy. He admits that we just don't know enough.

The first step to knowledge is the admission of ignorance.

I would also mention deforestation, CCD, chemical waste being dumped in the ocean, endangered species, extinction, depleted uranium etc.

There are so many other environmental issues which are being largely ignored in lieu of global warming.

@modestryan16 the U.N. invdades by proxy......think Iraq

Excellent! -- the concensus in the 70s- disaster- global cooling!!!!

and the did not "invade" they were there to do what there what they were supposed to do which is keep the peace. they replaced the belgium army, however, they still allowed a Belgium forces movement. this had to do with cold war politics. if the UN did what it was supposed to it would have fully replaced the Belgians, restored peace, than handed sovereignty to the legitimately elected independence movement.

ur telling me that when a popular independence movement is being confronted by powerful colonists mercenaries that when the UN tries to restore that independence that its illegitimate? it was a decision by the security council which is five nations. cold war tensions halted UN intervention, bcuz Belguim was a NATO ally, and when the UN did intervene they still allowed for a Belgium secessionist moment. youve got things very backwards.