Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

26B pp Four Rotor RX7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
33,767
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 13, 2010

Bryce McEwen's "FOURRE"

1992 Mazda RX7 series 6
Naturally aspirated 26B pp four rotor.
590 HP @ 8500 rpm (440 kw)
360 ft-lbs
runs consistent 10's
Best ET : 10.54 @ 213 kph

some clips from 2007 - 2010


a related video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFSXYXgmyUU&feature

the car is up for sale :
Mazda FOUR ROTOR RX7 1992 - Asking price: NZ$ 58,000 Or Near Offer on "Trade Me"
http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/used-cars/mazda/auction-395625204.htm

Performance

* 10.66 1/4 mile@ 202kmh
* Dynoed at 430 HP at the rear axle

some photos:

http://www.rx7club.com/showthread.php?t=882834

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • this think is BADASS!

    2.6 liter N/A 10 sec. "SICK!"

  • @richrich27 yea thats why 3 plugs would change the whole thing lol... more spark run less rich, will be more fuel friendly.. btw thats how the 4 rotor won the le mans... its gas lasted longer then the rest lol... and people say the rotary is not fuel efficient

see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • pice of shart evo just sat that one out haha

  • I love my rotaries by the way (I have two rx7s, vids on here). I'm just not blind to real facts and history.

  • Regarding the 787b. It won one single race (one that counted admittedly). It never won anything else. The win is due to reliability as the faster cars faltered and failed.

    It also wasn't banned. Group C rules ended as the new f1 inspired 3.5litre rules came in. The 26b along with all the other groupc cars now didn't fit.

    The 26b was used in the rx792p but was underpowered compared to it's competition (Imsa) All the history is there if you research.

  • It seems to have slowed down...is it wearing out?

  • @rollzon20z

    That's not entirely true. V8's are usually (because of the vehicles that they are designed to go into) broad powerband, torquey engines that won't really rev much. Rotaries are not torquey at all, heavly ported rotaries tend to behave like two strokes (lots of peaky HP but not much torque down low)... so in a drag race you'll lag until the engine builds revs and if you keep it in the powerband it will beat a V8 with the same BMEP (forget Hp), but not from the start.

  • @thor8333

    LMAO you must be stupid

  • @Acruz9301 True, sadly. Still love rotors though, just for the sound and image they have. They're kind of the underdogs in racing lol

  • @thor8333 lol what the fuck dude rotarys have bugger all torque but then again in figures a rotary with half the horse power of a v8 will still clean up a v8

  • @sumozack looked like a lancer that was riced up

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more