Flight path of AA77 into the pentagon

The History Channel shows two different flight paths into the pentagon.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• 9/11
• conspiracy
• theory
• history
• channel
• flight
• 77
• pentagon

[aaronshouse6977]

It is not a conspiracy if it is a fact and the fact is we have no plane parts, body parts or anything else that looks like it may have came from a 757 plane!!!!!!!!!

[mtvcmiller]

Also, Isn't it strange that almost the entire plane (including the engines) vaporized from the intense flames but yet all but one of the passengers and crew were able to be identified by their DNA. DNA is destroyed at 500 degrees. Aluminum melts at 1200 degrees. I guess the temperature would have to be a hell of a lot hotter for it to vaporize.

[mtvcmiller]

Look closely at the second animation. Notice how close the engines are to the ground. You honestly expect me to believe that an inexperienced pilot controlling this aircraft, knowing he was going to die, was able to fly into the pentagon without creating some damage to the lawn or, initially collapsing the roof?!?! Come on, people!!!

[mtvcmiller]

For those of you who still believe the official account of what happened at the pentagon, please click on my channel link(mtvcmiller) and check out my latest upload, Former 9/11 Commissioner admits Missile hit the Pentagon. A MUST SEE!!!

[mtvcmiller]

Let's get something straight here! The first animation shown was to line up with the collapse of the roof which didn't happen on the initial impact. The second animation was the supposed actual flight path into the pentagon that knocked over light poles and caused no damage to the lawn and left the roof somewhat fatigued but intact. In other words, a pinpoint strike! According to interviews, the hijacker in control of the plane had been denied the rental of a Cessna because he couldn't fly it!

[ghk13287]

The History Channel did blow it by putting up the first video. What does that prove? HC made a mistake. Does it prove the utterly stupid, stupid, stupid conspiracy theories? Of course not. But, that is the classic moron truther mentality: find one anomaly, and then claim it proves the most fanstastically complex plot imaginable. "Oooh - look at that typo in the credits - they were bought of by Dick Cheney!"

[mtvcmiller]

Actually, it does prove there are no real "experts" when it comes to certain aspects of the events of 9/11. "Expert Response", my arse!

[intrepidorator]

@sh9683 Look, Im not debating this with you. Anyone with a mind knows that the towers fell due to the planes flying into them, your opinion is irrelevent to intelligent debate, have a nice crazy life nutjob.

[sh9683]

@intrepidorator lol! whatever, if you really think that hypothesis that the government came up with are true then your the one who needs to use your head! fire did not bring 7 down it was not hot enough, office fires never are hot enough to bring them down! look at windsor for one, the one in shanghai etc,

building 7 free fell straight down on itself! the twins where also merely tower fires because the jet fuel was engulfed upon impact, we see an explosion right before the collapse, why?

[intrepidorator]

@sh9683 Look, I know that you're not able to provide any reliable sources for your conspiracy theory, that why Im not asking for 1. The fact remains, 911 was a terrorist attack. The buildings fell because of the jet airliners that flew into them. The buildings fell from the point of impact, not from the bottom up. No builoding has ever been intinntionally demolished from the middle down. Use your head.

[sh9683]

@intrepidorator no physic people with degrees and majors in physics have proven the government story wrong,

if you look, you realize the government tweaks there story every time we come up with solid facts against the terrorist storry

[intrepidorator]

@sh9683 Logical physics? is that a magazine?

[sh9683]

@THEBIGCAGEY your a retard we do have proof (video proof) of a missile, most planes would demolish in air or stall doing that manoeuvre at that speed! and a guy who failed passing a flight test for a sezna would somehow succeed at such a manoeuvre! with a huge jet? thats what is bull!!!

[sh9683]

@intrepidorator logical physics debunked all 9/11 commission!if you mean mechanics paid by government then sure they will say whatever! prove these debunked videos, and i will try to watch them without laughing at there absolute stupidity and how they don't do accurate demonstrations!

[sh9683]

a "terrorist" that was so bad he got rejected from flight school to fly a zesna somehow managed that manoeuvre with a big jet, YEAH RIGHT not possible! is it even possible for such a manoeuvre to be done without the plane shattering before impact? i think not, it would have stalled or broken! and if the terrorist threatened the pilot he was going to die if he didn't fly the plane into the pentagon, just remember the pilot woulda been a dead dude! think about it people, you are right btw

[PostalCode74]

@mtvcmiller They found PLENTY of debris consistent with a 757.

[Merlin5x5]

@hcanuck7

Here are all the video tapes of the Attack. Everybody has seen them for months.

The Parking lot CAMs are the ONLY CAMs to show the impact.

I realize TWOOFER idiots think there were 5 GAZILLION CAMS mounted on

the Pentagon, but there are NOT.

911myths. com/ index. php/ FBI_hides_ 84_Pentagon_videos

Every time there is an archive data release, the chances for a

conspiracy fade away like snow in a heater.