HITACHI EX1100 loading A30C
Loading...
Loading...
12,171
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 0:49Hitachi EX1200 up closeby SoCalEarthMovers190,749 views
- 1:34Huge Komatsu PC1250 loading small Sterling dump...by SoCalEarthMovers347,470 views
- 2:41CAT 375 down deepby SoCalEarthMovers12,338 views
- 3:30Hitachi Zaxis 870 - PERCASAby SALPU865,900 views
- 0:38MOV01154by Dimoncliner127,867 views
- 1:47Volvo A40Dby glennlund123282,186 views
- 0:37Excavator Flippedby clarkmaxwell117,147 views
- 1:04HITACHI 870 Autovia A-22by diego298894,521 views
- 7:29Road Construction 2009 Pt. 1 H264 Widescreen 12...by pitrow6620,351 views
- 0:38excavator digging the waterby johndeere720w32,346 views
- 1:30Hitachi EX1200by markcoutis12,569 views
- 3:53Liebherr R964B, CAT D6R und Volvo A30 Dumperby cat365d8,755 views
- 1:20hitachi excavator moving sandby hermanosplana57,971 views
- 7:40320 Cat Excavatorby ccr54226,275 views
- 2:36Volvo Dumptrucks compilatie A25C, A30C, A25D & ...by NovioSites980 views
- 1:212004 Hitachi EX1200 Excavatorby msloaneconsulting21,947 views
- 8:36320 Cat Excavatorby ccr54212,346 views
- 8:01Caterpillar 385C and 769Dby Gilles313901,145,764 views
- 1:03CAT 345 long reach excavator with pole grabby digga3755,694 views
@ke6gwf Very nice. Glad to see some intelligent people on youtube =D
MotoScootMech 5 months ago
@mog5858
Did I ever say anything about which direction the piston was moving? :)
I am well aware of the differential between the rod/cap ends.
My statement was that it didn't matter whether the rod was up or down, since Extension is still Extension.
"The force applied is between the ends of the cylinder/rod unit", so it doesn't matter which way it is flipped, other than the static weight of the cylinder and fluid inside it.
Did I get that right, or do I need to brush up on Fluid Power again? ;)
ke6gwf 11 months ago
@ke6gwf i will have to disagree with you. your rod end will not have the same power or lifting force as the cylinder end. the rod end will have a smaller piston area= less force cus you must subtract the rod area and on big cyinders like that if you have a 6 inch rod 27.27 square inch less on the rod side.
mog5858 11 months ago
@farlinj
The rods are much smaller in diameter and so mounting them to the carbody is more space efficient. It gets the large diameter cylinders and large long hoses up out of the way, also allowing better visibility for the operator.
Look at the view out the side window, and picture the cylinders being there instead of the rods!
ke6gwf 1 year ago
@d11rcd
Not really correct. The force applied is between the ends of the cylinder/rod unit, and it doesn't matter which way it's flipped, you still get the same force. Actually, by putting the cylinder on the work/upper side, you decrease load capacity by the weight of the cylinder and hydraulic fluid it contains.
The reason it's mounted like that is because the cylinders are so big it would take up space they need for other equipment. The rod ends are much slimmer. Better sightlines also.
ke6gwf 1 year ago
@farlinj Less lose of force transmission. All the energy to lift takes place in the cylinder, not the rod (shaft). By mounting it directly to the part being lifted, more force is applied to the part.
d11rcd 1 year ago
Why are the boom cylinders upside down on massive machines anyone know
farlinj 1 year ago
lol well no shit man that things buckets pritty much the size of a 200. but the 200 is nice to run
yukonsledder09 2 years ago
'twould be a bitch doin' that with our 200!
kimchiman1000 3 years ago