Re: Mass Cross Examination

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,594
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 9, 2007

Recorded real quick in a back room of my house. It's a response to James White on his cut and paste debate tactics.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (gnrhead)

  • By the way, why haven't you posted prchdaword's video response to your video? I know that you are aware of the video.

  • I don't have a single video response. If I had one, there'd be a refutation of it already posted. Why don't you make a video response to my videos instead of running your mouth. Try the Papacy video

  • Umm... When you say that you will "clobber [his] ridiculously ignorant comment" do you mean that you'll actually address it? Or do you mean that you will dismiss it with the wave of a hand, add some ad hominem remarks and then declare your point proven like you do in all of your videos? Just wondering? And by the way... Theodoret and Marcarius kinda hurt your 'unanimous' position and I welcome you to put them 'in context' and show that they didn't mean what they actually said.

  • Theodoret and Marcarius? I don't recall you ever posting a quote from those individuals. How about you do so. As far as me dealing with the response to Gelasius, I have one coming this evening. Been rather busy lately.

  • You know, I have come to this page many times and listened to the challenge many times yet I am left wondering why a response as to what the context of Gelasius REALLY was concerning the nature of the eucharist. Should I expect anything forthcoming or just settle with the usual silence?

  • Sorry have been busy lately and am waiting to respond in a video format. Don't worry, later this evening I'll clobber your ridiculously ignorant comment. Stop parroting James White, who has been refuted many times over. You simply make a fool of yourself. This will be fun

Top Comments

  • he got a fair point Ben, you should show a bit more Christian Charity, making sarcastic comments or making fun at another persons conflict is not keeping with Christ's, command "to love one another", we can all easily get carried away in these things, I have done it myself, but its not right. God Bless

  • Lol, get'im William!

see all

All Comments (181)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • OK partially true, but I definitely feel calling someone like "Billy Graham" a bimbo is a bit harsh to say the least.

  • Who was James white debating in your sound clip?

  • "Sutle"? 

    LOL

  • what has this got to do with the topic? are you a troublemaker looking for a response? or is this sutle ad-hominen a way of avoiding the issues?

  • Garfunkel**For even after the consecration the mystic symbols are not deprived of their own nature; they remain in their former substance figure and form; they are visible and tangible as they were before (Theodoret, Dialogue II, Eranistes and Orthodoxus)

  • Both are indeed here and remain uncommented on" hence Simon and Grafunkel applies "Sound of silence"

    Bread and wine are offered, being the figure of the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ. They who participate in this visible bread eat, spiritually, the flesh of the Lord. (Macarius, Homily xxvii

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more