Re: Mass Cross Examination
Uploader Comments (gnrhead)
Top Comments
-
he got a fair point Ben, you should show a bit more Christian Charity, making sarcastic comments or making fun at another persons conflict is not keeping with Christ's, command "to love one another", we can all easily get carried away in these things, I have done it myself, but its not right. God Bless
-
Lol, get'im William!
All Comments (181)
-
OK partially true, but I definitely feel calling someone like "Billy Graham" a bimbo is a bit harsh to say the least.
-
Who was James white debating in your sound clip?
-
"Sutle"?
LOL
-
what has this got to do with the topic? are you a troublemaker looking for a response? or is this sutle ad-hominen a way of avoiding the issues?
-
Garfunkel**For even after the consecration the mystic symbols are not deprived of their own nature; they remain in their former substance figure and form; they are visible and tangible as they were before (Theodoret, Dialogue II, Eranistes and Orthodoxus)
-
Both are indeed here and remain uncommented on" hence Simon and Grafunkel applies "Sound of silence"
Bread and wine are offered, being the figure of the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ. They who participate in this visible bread eat, spiritually, the flesh of the Lord. (Macarius, Homily xxvii
By the way, why haven't you posted prchdaword's video response to your video? I know that you are aware of the video.
prophet70 4 years ago
I don't have a single video response. If I had one, there'd be a refutation of it already posted. Why don't you make a video response to my videos instead of running your mouth. Try the Papacy video
gnrhead 4 years ago
Umm... When you say that you will "clobber [his] ridiculously ignorant comment" do you mean that you'll actually address it? Or do you mean that you will dismiss it with the wave of a hand, add some ad hominem remarks and then declare your point proven like you do in all of your videos? Just wondering? And by the way... Theodoret and Marcarius kinda hurt your 'unanimous' position and I welcome you to put them 'in context' and show that they didn't mean what they actually said.
prophet70 4 years ago
Theodoret and Marcarius? I don't recall you ever posting a quote from those individuals. How about you do so. As far as me dealing with the response to Gelasius, I have one coming this evening. Been rather busy lately.
gnrhead 4 years ago
You know, I have come to this page many times and listened to the challenge many times yet I am left wondering why a response as to what the context of Gelasius REALLY was concerning the nature of the eucharist. Should I expect anything forthcoming or just settle with the usual silence?
Arrsht 4 years ago
Sorry have been busy lately and am waiting to respond in a video format. Don't worry, later this evening I'll clobber your ridiculously ignorant comment. Stop parroting James White, who has been refuted many times over. You simply make a fool of yourself. This will be fun
gnrhead 4 years ago