Upload

This video is unavailable.

White House Summit on Environmental Education

whitehouse whitehouse·3,931 videos
332,901

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
1,413
Like     Dislike 4

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like whitehouse's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike whitehouse's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add whitehouse's video to your playlist.

Published on Apr 17, 2012

The White House convenes a diverse group of stakeholders to discuss the importance of environmental education and the core concepts and principles that contribute the most to environmental literacy, including panel discussions with environmental education leaders, remarks from several Administration officials and a panel on the Federal government's on-going commitment to the field of environmental education.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (6)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • mrsokla

    The earth has always wobbled. It gets colder at times and warmer at times depending on the wobble. I don't understand how the EPA comes to conclusions regarding chemicals with Global Warming Potential. Earthquakes are a sign that the earth is constantly changing. It doesn't surprise me that Geologists have come to more logical conclusion than Environmental Specialists. Refrigerants effect the Ozone Layer. How do molecules much heavier than air rise to the ozone layer and react with Ozone??

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mrsokla's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mrsokla's comment.
  • Hannesexy

    Thank you for that!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Hannesexy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Hannesexy's comment.
    in reply to RequisiteNonentity (Show the comment)
  • RequisiteNonentity

    'clean' is a relative term. the EPA does not consider carbon dioxide a pollutant [1]. The strong environmental laws past in the early 70's have had a positive effect[2], decreasing the amount of pollutants classified by the EPA. I couldn't find any of the graphs i remember from my climate change and sustainability course that show from the 60's but if you spend some time looking I'm sure you could find them

    [1] epa.gov/ttn/atw/188polls.html

    [2] epa.gov/airtrends/index.html

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate RequisiteNonentity's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate RequisiteNonentity's comment.
    in reply to Hannesexy (Show the comment)
  • Hannesexy

    "The air is cleaner than 40 years ago"? Is that true?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Hannesexy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Hannesexy's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later