Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Katherine K. Young Deposition in Perry v. Schwarzenegger (Excerpt)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,472
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 20, 2010

This week, the pro-Prop 8 defendants in the federal case Perry v. Schwarzenegger withdrew two people, Paul Nathanson, Ph.D. and Katherine Young, Ph.D, from their federal trial witness list. Their depositions by the anti-Prop 8 plaintiffs' attorney David Boies of The American Foundation For Equal Rights seem to indicate the witnesses would not have been much help to the defendants.

FULL VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndRwg2QePGM

TRANSCRIPT:
http://www.equalrightsfoundation.org/news/katherine-young-deposition-transcript/

PAUL NATHANSON DEPOSITION EXCERPT:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FylixiSFwqg

ALL VIDEO EVIDENCE:
https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/evidence/index.html

USDCCAND PERRY CASE WEB PAGE:
https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/index.html

AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR EQUAL RIGHTS:
http://www.equalrightsfoundation.org/

PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER WIKIPEDIA ENTRY:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_v._Schwarzenegger

KATHERINE K. YOUNG WIKIPEDIA ENTRY:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katherine_K._Young

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (PerryVSchwarzenegger)

  • Where's the whole thing? This one is edited. Is this the gay rights Andrew Breitbart video method?

  • @ActaNonVerba71 The full video of this deposition was released by the US District Court of California Northern District along with Judge Walker's decision. See info section for the link.

Top Comments

  • I find it OFFENSIVE that the defense in this case lied about why they were excusing this witness. Their own witnesses' testimony REFUTES THIER CLAIMS in this case! How much more evidence is needed to overturn this horrible law and provide a means to strengthen the protection from majority rule against the equal protection clause of the CA constitution?

  • This truth must be revealed to the public in a major media campaign. Now we know why these bigots were too embarrassed to testify.

see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They argue marriage is not for the sake of the adults, but for the benefit of the children. And for the healthy development of kids they need male AND female mature ideal at the same time in the daily life.

  • @PerryVSchwarzenegger thank you

  • Freedom ... IF we made any mistakes in the past, imho it was the idea that there could be any sort of compromise with these bigots. They are NOT our friends, and given their way, every one of our political and social gains as LGBT people would be removed. Of course they are too embarrassed to let their true motives be made public .. they are snakes.

  • I hope Rachel Maddow shows this stuff on her show.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more