THE ATHEIST EXPERIENCE LOSES (with commentary)

NOTE: If you have any comments to make, then please read my on-line pamplet: GOD: THE TRUE STORY www.godtruestory.webs.com, whilch will probably answer your questions. As for the present video, annotated comments may not appear on mobile phones or Iphones.

This is my appearance on the Atheist Experience, episode 713. I admit I could've been better prepared. As soon as I called in, I was on-air -- and I just called on a whim. So I created this video to add further replies as though I had a bit more rehearsal. Even so, AE loses. They seem to think I'm arguing in favor of only the Christian God All I said, though, was that I "just happen" to be a Christian. I'm actually arguing in favor of God only as pure reason. They lose because they steer the argument to justify their pre-conclusion, demonstrate displays of anger, and Matt makes a strawman conclusion at the end after I was already off the air.

Basically, this above video can be summed up in this comment I made on the Atheist Experience channel prior to being banned from commenting on their videos:

"The analogy of 'making things up' is a poor one. The hosts seem not to comprehend that a mug-creature, bigfoot, and fairies consist of physical constructs that wouldn't be necessary beyond space-time. What I, the caller, was about to say before being hung-up upon is that only pure reason fulfills the criteria without positing unnecessary constructs. Matt also hung up on Matt Slick when Slick had him cornered."

Sam Harris (on consciousness) from "The End Of Faith": "The idea that brains _produce_ consciousness is little more than an article of faith among scientists at present, and there are many reasons to believe that the methods of scientists will be insufficient to either prove or disprove it" (p. 208).

I created this video with the YouTube Video Editor
(http://www.youtube.com/editor)

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Atheist Experience
• latest
• episode
• 747
• 745
• 744
• 743
• 739
• 737
• 736
• 734
• 733
• 731
• 721
• william lane craig
• dr. craig
• god
• proof
• shock of god
• revelation
• Pascal's wager
• St. Anselm
• Aquinas
• Duns Scotus
• Occam
• logos
• nous
• agape
• proof of god
• 1/15

[ChaoticRupture]

I cant believe this...the guy that uploaded this... got his comment marked as spam.. how pathetic you have to be to be pwned at your own videos?

[albpeter]

The caller lost, any logical person could see this.

[MrRobseed]

the caller certainly does not win. 

[thanksforthemessdick]

thanks for the upload. I love these guys,whether you do or not,...they lose ,michael jackson had no talent' the sky was yellow and the sun was blue.It does not make you right.but go ahead and believe it .I wont do you any harm unless your belief causes you to do me harm.PEACE

[MadHighway]

@namesameasu said: "kay, you say neurotransmitters. I'm asking: How? You say chemicals. I still ask: How? What specific chemicals caused consciousness to emerge?"

You can enrol in an accredited university for a four-year program and learn all the answers you seek. You need to learn from astronomers, geologists, physicists, chemists, and biologists, and do it their way rather than challenge them.

[MadHighway]

@namesameasu said "rational arguments that don't provide for that demand."

Rational arguments that use non-real concepts as evidence? Pull the other one.

[Screenplaya]

Wow, the uploader/caller seems crazy. The fact that physicists know that the big bang breaks no physical laws is lost on this guy. The fact is that it is scientifically possible. He thinks he won based on the fact that two talk show hosts can't fully explain the reasons scientists give? Such delusion is only possible through the blindness of faith.

[MultiShampain]

@albpeter No the caller clearly won which is why they are getting angry in the vocal tones as they usually have to debate dummies when they are exposed to people with a higher IQ they try to shout and blabber as they are exposed as ignorant. We have no idea what created the universe somthing happend we exist that is the proof but the life from non life question is a great mystery

[markeybizz]

@JesusIsTheOneWay (cont) Big deal what the bible says, the quaran says 'It is a fact that ALLAH is the Truth, while the setting up of any idols beside Him constitutes a falsehood, and that ALLAH is the Most High, the Supreme' yet you do not belive in that 'truth', your measure of truth is clearly misguided. Theres no dificuality with believing in a creator, just dont conform to horribly exclusive and mallicious dogma like Christianity or Islam

[markeybizz]

@JesusIsTheOneWay a-thiesm- the contention that you dont personally believe in god or gods, if the evidence was there rationalists would accept god, many atheists/agnostcs even consider themselves pantheists. We reject 'God' because the word 'god' is a loaded word, it places anthrapamothic evil traits created by religion, atheists do not reject the claim there could be a creator.

[mandrillx]

@JesusIsTheOneWay God says nothing ,never did. Basically god = an invisible magical wizard tha magically poofs entire universes out of nothing but some how no evidence of him exists . magic does not exist and niether does your invisible wizard friend.

[JesusIsTheOneWay]

Jesus said the wisdom of this world is foolishness to God. I can believe there is a God that created everything because I can see much of it. What I can't believe is how blind atheists are to think that it all just happened without God. But the Bible covers this. It says that unbelievers are blinded to the truth. Jesus told them, as reported in the book of John, that those who mocked him were children of the devil and they couldn't hear him. His sheep hear him but others wont.