David Ray Griffin on the 9/11 Cell Phone Calls: Exclusive CBC Interview

CBC The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story
Exclusive Video Interview: David Ray Griffin

Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners:
Response to Questions Evoked by My Fifth Estate Interview
by Prof David Ray Griffin
Global Research, January 12, 2010
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16924

A professor emeritus of Philosophy of Religion and Theology at the Clarement School of Theology in California for 30 years , David Ray Griffin has today, through his books and lectures, become better known as one of the leading voices of the "9/11 Truth Movement." Through his investigation and analysis of the fall of the Twin Towers and mysterious collapse of World Trade Centre 7, the attack on the Pentagon and the final 9/11 Commission Report, Griffin continues to raise provocative questions about the inconsistencies and contradictions of the official version of the events of September 11, 2001.

CBC - The Fifth Estate - The Unofficial Story
http://www.youtube.com/user/Steeper33#p/c/ED2296DA4AB853A7/0/TkYlbpS-vVI

CBC The Fifth Estate Unofficial Story 9/11 Truth ae911truth News Canada Canadian al-Qaida 11 September 2001 Terror New York Osama bin Laden Bush Biden Cheney False Flag Inside Job Conspiracy Theory Iraq Afghanistan Niels Harrit Jones Controlled Demolition Nano Thermite Dust WTC Patriot Act David Ray Griffin War Peace Steeper33

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• David
• Ray
• Griffin
• CBC
• The
• Fifth
• Estate
• Unofficial
• Story
• 9/11
• Truth
• Exclusive
• Interview
• ae911truth
• News
• Canada
• Canadian
• al-Qaida
• 11
• September
• 2001
• Terror
• New
• York
• Osama
• bin
• Laden
• Bush
• Biden
• Cheney
• False
• Flag
• Inside
• Job
• Conspiracy
• Theory
• Iraq
• Afghanistan
• Niels
• Harrit
• Jones
• Controlled
• Demolition
• Nano
• Thermite
• Steeper33

[bman342a]

@ucancallmeOh DRG's research has been called in to question far too many times to quote him as gospel on anything. This "issue out of context" type argument is what is so completely wrong with the Truther-ish "logic". If you go looking for a conspiracy, you can concoct one. Do I have an issue with certain things pertaining to the investigation? Yes, as I would with probably any investigation. But it pertains more to parts related to our lapses in defense, rather than to any conspiracy nonsense.

[bman342a]

@ucancallmeOh Yes, I believe that WTC7 came down due to fires, which burned out of control for 7-8 hours in no small part due to the sprinkler systems being knocked out by the tower collapses. It was also due to its unique architecture. Somehow at the point of collapse, with TV and video cameras trained on it, and being circled by hundreds of emergency workers, 7 managed to fall without a sound.

Provide PROOF that FDR knew in advance. Won't hold my breath. WTC had one brief stage of free-fall.

[ucancallmeOh]

@bman342a ~ 1. NIST: Dr. Sunder, official spokesman for NIST stated very precisely that WTC 7 came down due to "normal office fires". Do YOU believe WTC 7 came down due to office fires?

2. Pearl Harbor: FDR knew in advance that it was to be attacked. He let it happen so that the U.S. could justify getting into "Europe's war".

3. Free fall: watch?v=-GUTmmqfmyg

WTC 7 Freefall by David Chandler

[bman342a]

@ucancallmeOh You need to read the NIST report. Particularly the addenda. Near free fall is NOT free fall. Gravity is funny that way. That Harrit has not been refuted can also be chalked up to the lack of need for refutation. And I am being polite here. So even the non-starter Operation Northwoods. Do some research. It never contemplated harming our own, either civilian or military. Pearl harbor was not a false flag, please don't spread that nonsense.

[ucancallmeOh]

@bman342a ~ 1. The collapses and near free fall: AE911truth(dot)org, right side, explanation boxes (take ya 5 minutes)

2. The paper by Harrit et al. has not been refuted by a single scientist. "Active Thermitic Material Found in the Dust of the WTC..."

3.False flags: Gulf of Tonkin/ Vietnam; Pearl Harbor (let it happen); Sinking of the Maine; and, in 1962 JFK refused it, but Google "Operation Northwoods" (#8 is closest to 9/11)

[bman342a]

@ucancallmeOh None of the buildings experienced full free-fall. Blg 7's collapse was categorized into three stages, one of which briefly experienced free-fall. Again, Harrit, nor anyone else, has any evidence of thermate or any other CD-type materials. Am not aware of a false flag operation that intentionally killed its own people. It's ridiculous to even consider it a possibility. 9/11 truth has nothing to do with what thruthers say about it.

[ucancallmeOh]

@bman342a- If it weren't for near free fall speed of collapses, symmetrically, and the other evidence for WTC 7 and WTC 1 & 2, you might, possibly have a point. But the evidence by Harrit et al corroborates the video and photographic evidence that we all have seen.

9/11 was a FALSE FLAG OPERATION and COVER-UP.

9/11 TRUTH ---> 9/11 JUSTICE!

[bman342a]

@ucancallmeOh The problem is, truthers have zero evidence. Sorry, but no "active thermitic material" was EVER found. I don't have to search for Harrit, I've read and listened to him. So what? If you read Harrit carefully he never says it is active material. You think a court of law would even consider evidence collected by lay people, and that had been laying around their houses for six years in non-sterile environments? Clearly being contaminated? Sorry.

[ucancallmeOh]

@bman342a ~ If you look at all the evidence/ scientific facts laid out on the right side of AE911truth(dot)org website that is pretty difficult to argue with.

Then, you add in Danny Jowenko's statement regarding WTC 7 being "Controlled Demolition...absolutely".

Add on to that the findings of the paper, "Active Thermitic Material Found in the Dust of the WTC Catastrophe" (by Harrit et al., just Google title to find it), which has not been refuted in 3 years -- that's PROOF of CD.

[bman342a]

@ucancallmeOh Hi, please don't take any offense, but you sound completely ignorant. To say that there is no other explanation for the CD is in itself an ignorant comment in that it assumes CD as the default explanation, which it most certainly is not. And to ever come into a conversation saying there is "no other explanation", is setting yourself up for ridicule. The "truthers" would be laughed out of court as there is ZERO evidence for CD.