A Question Of Origins - Debunk 1of6

This debunk of young earth creationist lies and misrepresentations includes many promoted by ICR "Institute Of Creation Research" (where you go to learn to become a quoteminologist). Gary Parker, Dwayne Gish and many other will amuse you with their wacky, zany ideas. Unfortunately, they will also terrify you when you realise that they want these lies taught in school science classes and many people actually believe whatever these liars put out.

youtube.com/extantdodo

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• institute
• creation
• reasearch
• parker
• gish
• morris
• evolution

[myodoc42]

Unfortunately, we scientists seem to be stuck with the term "Big Bang", which is very misleading. It was not an explosion, but an expansion of Space-Time. It's probably too late to stop using that term, so the best we can hope for is to educate a few as to what it really means. Too bad some people wont bother to learn what a theory really is before trying to "refute" it.

[djarm67]

The term was originally coined by Fred Hoyle as a derogatory term as he was advocating a "steady state" universe model.

[tonb3rry3]

For me the utter sleaziness of the creationists prove evolution beyond reasonable doubt!

[JESUSCHRYStLERdaKING]

Did you get votebotted? Your videos are great but have low ratings.

[kvlo1986]

I agree, the whole creationist or intelligent design upsurging here against evolution, is an infiltration from political parties from the top, wishing to keep people biblical and stupid, so that they can earn votes. This way they keep religion as something relevant, and further use it to manage the country, -making issues such as gay marriage and abortion still relevant, and which defense by voting for the progressive party will send them to hell. Why else would people for for republicans? Fear.

[inotaishu1]

On the topic of dogs descending from wolves, believe it or not but I just recently read a book saying that they descended from some other dingo-like canine and not the gray wolf. Despite the fact that there is no physical or genetical evidence for this, Quite the contrary. As far as I know this "new" theory (it's actually old but got a new costume) is based on the assumption that when feral domestic animals return to their original shape. Of course that is not how evolution works.

[marcelobetel]

A lie is a mutation of the Truth!

Scientist (secular ones) know how to promote a mutation very welll...

...especially when their research are maintained by companies linked to terrorist financier illuminati

[Forceofbubbles]

I didn't see any debunking. I did notice that the first three sections on cosmology, chemical and the origin of life itself were avoided. I Wonder why?

Then we have helacyton gartleri wheeled in as evidence of evolution!!!! Why not use the more common reference of cancer? This is horizontal gene transfer and no new genes are added. As for it being a new species that is still being debated. Typical evolution tripe.

[jordanBLP1]

Going off of TheHomelessCripple's comment about the illusion of conciousness.. does anyone think its possible for super fast future quantum computeres to develope a conciousness.. or would the lack of sensory information from the millions upon millions of nerves in biological body make this sort of impossible?

[jordanBLP1]

@TheHomelessCripple I like the second part of your comment.. makes your realize how amazing mother nature really is

[TheHomelessCripple]

@bownimrod all matter is non-living. quarks and atoms aren't capable of metabolism or reproduction let alone conscious thought. The only thing that is important for life (and evolution) are, organic molecules and amino-acids and water.

Your consciousness and sense of "being alive" is an illusion created by electro-chemical signals firing neurons in your brain, lighting it up in a firestorm of sensation, and your memory storing and assigning meaning to familiar stimuli and patterns.

[mironyuk]

What a great video, to bad some moron had to ruin it with his comments