Pilots For 9/11 Truth Presents "9/11 INTERCEPTED" - (Full Film) MUST WATCH!

Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org to order your own personal high quality copy to share with friends and family. Thank you for your support!

War Games, Simulated radar tracks, aircraft exceeding their max operating limits by more than 130-150 knots, inaccurate aircraft position reports, false aircraft target reports, aircraft converging -- flying virtually in formation with -- and then diverging from reported 9/11 aircraft, fighters launched in the wrong direction, aircraft seemingly still airborne after the alleged attack, poor communications, phones not working.... What happened on the morning of September 11, 2001? Why were our defenses ineffective? Pilots For 9/11 Truth analyze NORAD response, Audio recordings as well as Radar data provided by government agencies.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• September 11
• 2001
• 911
• 9-11
• 9/11
• war games
• neads
• norad
• faa
• fbi
• military
• pentagon
• world trade center
• wtc
• twin towers
• bush
• cheney
• rumsfled
• otis
• AFB
• stand
• down
• PEOC
• flights
• 11
• 175
• 93
• 77
• drone
• drones
• operation
• northwoods

[fakeyf9]

Actually, all these details about the day of 9/11 are irrelevant. Al-CIA-duh's hijack plan would fail if the planes were intercepted. Interception of wayward and hijacked planes is SOP and NORAD had a 100% intercept success rate prior to 9/11. Why would professional "terrorists" believe for even a second that their plan would work. Its absolutely ridiculous. The only possible way for it to succeed is if they knew before hand that the plane would not be intercepted.

[Cincinnati911Truth]

@fakeyf9

You're absolutely right.

[wasaka2]

This video doesn't state that when the first plane changed course it did so in a radar blackout spot. I have read that somewhere, if true, it should be added to this video.

[Cincinnati911Truth]

@wasaka2

I agree. I've read about that too. That definitely shows insider knowledge of radar blackout areas.

[Kenyon712]

Was it tested and shown to be metal and what metal?

[Cincinnati911Truth]

@Kenyon712

Off the top of my head I don't know. Google it.

[Cincinnati911Truth]

@Kenyon712

It completely collapsed due to controlled demolition. In order for WTC 7 to completely collapse the way it did, falling symmetrically down in about seven seconds, the support columns and girders had to give way at about the exact same time simultaneously. That could only be done with explosives. NIST even had to admit that WTC 7 fell at FREEFALL ACCELERATION for 2,25 seconds. This is impossible without controlled demolition. Even Shyam Sunder admitted to the 2.25 seconds.

[Cincinnati911Truth]

@Kenyon712

An employee, Barry Jennings, of the WTC 7's 23rd floor Emergency Management Operations Center was trapped in the WTC 7 building and stated that explosions were going off prior to either WTC 1 or WTC 2 collapsing. (That would have been prior to 10:03 am.) Jennings also spoke of walking over bodies as the the FDNY rescued him (and Mr. Hess) from WTC 7. So yes, there was interior explosive damage to WTC 7. But videos don't show WTC 7 "engulfed in flames".

[crazyjo9]

Marvin bush disliked this video

[Vann7]

@Cincinnati911Truth Probably Those bodies were people that the government wanted killed before they come with their cover up.. people not cooperating with their plans and could expose the operation. Jennings in my opinion they tried to kill him inside WTC7 but they failed 

[Vann7]

youtube.. April Gallop.. pentagon employer says no plane inside pentagon. says 911 was a fraud.

[momotaro2001]

@fakeyf9 It depends what their plan was, and what you mean by interception. Before the first plane hit, the order was only given to "tail" the airliner. There's the possibility that the hijackers themselves were "hustled" and that their original plan was merely to land the plane at a nearby airport and wait for their demands to be met. That's a text-book hijacking. If the planes were pre-modified with Dov Zakheim's remote control FTS, then the hijackers would have had the shock of their lives.

[fakeyf9]

@Kenyon712 To answer you question as to how it should have happened then I dare you to read the entire article at 911blogger(dot)com/node/16623. Read it if you have the guts and ask yourself how the hijackers knew beforehand that NORAD would fail.

[fakeyf9]

@Kenyon712 It was not a matter of whether or not it did succeed.Prior to 9/11 why would the hijackers think their plan would work.NORAD had a 100% success rate of intercepting wayward and hijacked jets within minutes.It SOP to immediately scramble and intercept commerical jets that lose their transponder or radar contact,or fail to communicate with ATC.This happened routinely for decades.A 30 minute delay is unprecedented.Why would the hijackers think NORAD would fail on 9/11.

[mujaku]

@Cincinnati911Truth The problem with the CCD (conventional controlled demolition) hypothesis, there is no seismic evidence for a CCD - no P or S waves were ever recorded. Another problem, there should have a several storeys of debris. There wasn't. Also when WTC 7 went down it did so silently. CCDs make a lot of noise. In the case of WTC 7, it would be like raining 20,000 dump trucks with fireworks.

[Kenyon712]

@fakeyf9 They didn't totally succeed. Flight 93 never reached its destination. Was that planned? There was only about 30mins from the time flight 11 ignored ATC to the time it hit tower 1. Please explain how it could have been intercepted? While your at it explain how each flight could have been intercepted. Do you really think the minute the plane stopped communicating and its trasponder was lost, fighter jets would be on its tail preparing to shoot it down?