Chomsky - Perle Debate - Part 3
Top Comments
All Comments (280)
-
I dunno how Chomsky does it.
The stupidity of right-wingers knows no limits, it's annoying as fuck. To be this calm whilst debating against them would require a steady supply of tamazepam.
-
Because the US has a population of around 300,000,000 people, and tries to maintain a bullshit moral highground at all times. They have to hide their crimes or they will have no support.
-
Perle is beyond pathetic. A lap dog for the imperial zionist plunderers and barbarians.
where does one see American control? what a scoundrel.
-
If the US is such a powerful "Evil Empire", why would they go through all this political cloak and dagger? Why not just conquer all these countries and directly control the people and resources? Isn't that what an Evil Empire would do? And if it required all the cloak and dagger secrecy, why allow a Chomsky to publicly spill the beans? Wouldn't an Evil Emperor have snuffed him out long ago? Darned common sense just keeps haunting me.
-
So Reagan is responsible for crimes "mereting comparison to Pol Pot,". Is that Chomsky's way of saying that Reagan really isn't that bad, just misunderstood.
-
@ZakBrownrigg123 and that too shall pass...
-
@Bodhidharma1986 : You are 100% correct. as my 30 years of research would bear out.
Presidents have no relevance to anything in the long run because they're dispensed to the public by the elite sectors of finance and industry. The "Executive" Branch is named that for a reason. A close knit network of major- Corporations and investment firms run the economy, staff all the major Executive branches of govt (including president), they own the major media, and they own the country. The two 'parties' are two factions of a one-party State; a Business State. Democracy? Not at all.
Bodhidharma1986 1 year ago 10
How much money does the NYT make from adverts when nobody buys their paper?
JessAtlas 1 year ago 3