Cancer Facts : Nanotechnology in Cancer Treatment

Nanotechnology cancer treatments use tiny particles to unleash poisons into cancer cells without the harmful side effects of chemotherapy. Learn how nanotechnology is improving cancer treatments with information from a doctor in this free video on cancer.

Expert: Dr. David Cathcart
Bio: Dr. David Cathcart specializes in occupational medicine and has an in-depth knowledge of cancer, as well as experience dealing with cancer patients and treatment for multiple years.
Filmmaker: Johnny Cathcart

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• cancer
• diseases
• skin cancer
• colon cancer
• lung cancer
• breast cancer

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou "I can write a computer program to calculate the positions of the planets in one day. This mechanical clock is far more advanced than any clock made today. Discovery is not intelligence."

Write the program and send it to me tomorrow and then I'll believe you.

[sweetclaire06]

@GoodScienceForYou As I read this exchange between you and AlanCFA never mind who is right or wrong. He expresses his point of view in a civil manner while you repeatedly resort to nasty name calling and personal attacks. You do this with a 'Religious fervor" that is offensive and undeniable. You do not come off as an educated person. You sound like a fanatical crackpot.

[159tony]

there is also a drug that stops blood vessel growth. how is this important? cancer makes new blood vessels to feed itself and to grow and to eat this drug it basically stops the cancer from growing any bigger and from harming you any further. and gives you more time and options to think about during to process. but on the down side it only works for a one kind of cancer and has not yet been tested to such as lung or brain cancer.

[AlanCFA]

@GoodScienceForYou ". I am the teachers' teacher. It is what I am called" just exactly who calls you that?

On YT and on the Spa forums you are a laughingstock, not the teacher's teacher.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "Some people are weak sucks and take things the wrong way. It takes guts to know the truth"

That is quite a statement coming from a coward like you. NephilimFree, Kent Hovind, Ken Ham, all have the same beliefs as you, but at least they have the courage to admit their beliefs are from the bible and that they are Christians. You are such a gutless coward as to deny it, even when YOU wrote "We are honest Christians who believe in God and believe in what is taught".

Weak suck indeed.

[AlanCFA]

@GSFY "I read and saw the whole 'thing' on this prediction." They were looking to force some fish fossil in to this belief. So, of course they were going to find it." Nope. It fit the prediction. YOU are the one with the belief system.

"If I wanted to predict where I would find a fish fossil I would go where lots of fish fossils are found"

Oh, in Canada in rocks that are 340my old? Face it, Jimmy, there is massive evidence for evolution and no evidence for your supernatural ghost.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@AlanCFA I read and saw the whole "thing" on this prediction. They were looking to force some fish fossil in to this belief. So, of course they were going to find it. It is not any form of transitional fossil, because there is nothing before it and nothing after it. It just went extinct, as all genetically unfit degraded creatures do. If I wanted to predict where I would find a fish fossil I would go where lots of fish fossils are found. Moron.

[AlanCFA]

2/2

The discovery of tiktaalik was possible because the theory of evolution and the knowledge of the earth's history gave them the understanding of what type of creature would have transitional features between fish and tetrapods. You claim that the theory is a religion, pseudo science, etc and that the age of the earth and the geological history is also unknowable, yet these sciences all came together to accurately predicted this discovery well in advance

You are a Christian creationist, period

[AlanCFA]

1/2

@GSFY "This idea that magical mutations will make things better or more complex is the belief in this 'pseudo science'.

Scientists predicted that tiktaalik would be found in a particular geographical location (Ellesmere Island), in a particular stratum (the Fram Formation), with the features they knew it would posses as predicted by the theory of evolution and the knowledge that this area was near the equator 375 my ago.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 If you were to remove the medicines, the medical doctors, the treatments, go live in a tiny village with huts, then you would understand. The human genome is weak. Artificial means of survival is also one of the reasons for genetic degradation causing more atrophy of genes.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 According to these "scientists" you believe, the reason is from genetic mutations and a weakness in the immune system from de-evolution. If you have cancer, you would normally listen to what I am telling you. We have know about how the immune system was designed to destroy cancer cells for at least 30 years.

[GoodScienceForYou]

@sweetclaire06 I don't claim there is gene loss. The PHD's who send in the 88,000 peer papers on "gene loss" do. The medical community is doing the work to detect diseases. While they are doing it, they discovered there is only gene loss and bad things from these mutations that are supposed to make us better. /watch?v=spuZtAa80qI This is word for word from the US medical site.