Plante was regarded as a dry technical classical type by his contemporaries.
He liked the agogical approach that goes better with Dussek,Cramer,Ries,and Kalkbrenner etc...You're more attracted to a warmer more evocative style vocal style of Post-Bellini France.Plante for his day is like Reinecke,or even Thalberg..a bit of a "Throwback" and creating more interesting articulation than florid gesture.
I hace some difficulty with the Plante recordings: they are far from compelling me. I find the recording by the likes of Diemer, Pugno and Saint-Saens far more convincing as exponents of the "French" school of the period. When I listen to Plante (and I have done extensively), I am sort of just made to think I am hearing the remnants of a great pianist. What is really needed is a study of Plante's piano rolls from prior to his nonangenarian recordings, to see whether and how the style differs.
Obviously Plante's work carries enormous significance for us today.What piques my interest is that he is a conservative classistically oriented player(as considered by his contemporaries),but by modern standards,he's beyond acceptable ...consider-
j adore
marcussalieri 3 years ago
bravo simple elegant comme du cramer
marcussalieri 3 years ago
I think that his playing has the same quality of Reinecke's,that of being,cutsey and whimsical,.but certainly not "compelling"
smithsherman 3 years ago
Just because he was a highly regarded French classicist in Romantic times,doesn't necessarily mean he'll warm your toes.
smithsherman 3 years ago
Judging by Plante's contemporaries his playing in the 1920s was perfectly well preserved which in view of his age,was seen as an anomaly.
smithsherman 3 years ago 2
Plante was regarded as a dry technical classical type by his contemporaries.
He liked the agogical approach that goes better with Dussek,Cramer,Ries,and Kalkbrenner etc...You're more attracted to a warmer more evocative style vocal style of Post-Bellini France.Plante for his day is like Reinecke,or even Thalberg..a bit of a "Throwback" and creating more interesting articulation than florid gesture.
smithsherman 3 years ago
I hace some difficulty with the Plante recordings: they are far from compelling me. I find the recording by the likes of Diemer, Pugno and Saint-Saens far more convincing as exponents of the "French" school of the period. When I listen to Plante (and I have done extensively), I am sort of just made to think I am hearing the remnants of a great pianist. What is really needed is a study of Plante's piano rolls from prior to his nonangenarian recordings, to see whether and how the style differs.
d60944 3 years ago
Obviously Plante's work carries enormous significance for us today.What piques my interest is that he is a conservative classistically oriented player(as considered by his contemporaries),but by modern standards,he's beyond acceptable ...consider-
ably.Clearly we've erred.
smithsherman 3 years ago