Ann Coulter laughs at Obama assassination

Facts be damn in Ann's loony universe, "Every assassination or attempted assassination in the history of America was committed by a liberal." Coulter's psychotic belief system equates liberals with communists, anarchists, and Palestinian extremists; even non-political assassins or those simply insane are deemed to be guaranteed liberals from her bizarre conservative fortress. To Ann Coulter, assassination is a "fun little part" of her new book. Coulter chillingly laughs at the thought of an assassination attempt of President Obama by a liberal member of his base. Her eerie, creepy laugh and vision is repeated at the end.

Poor little Ann-the-Victim claims that the liberal media is ignoring her new book about liberal victims and their assault on America yet she seems to have saturated the airwaves with her malicious, insincere whines. Her fact-deficient rants are so ridiculous that her frightful mug could supplant illustrations for all definitions of irony, deceit and victim hood.

This video features a triple-speed drive through Washington, DC along with a segment of Coulters C-SPAN Afterword radio interview with Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute president Michelle Easton. The goal of the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute is to engage, inform, and connect conservatives across the country to shape the future. Ann Coulter was not only a guest speaker at the CBLPI but appears on the CBLPI Pretty in Mink! calendar for 2009. Ann is Miss September. Yes, irrational and immoral Ann, replete with hate-filled rhetoric, is lauded and sought by conservatives everywhere.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Ann
• Coulter
• President
• Obama
• liberal
• assassin
• assassinate
• assassination
• hate
• speech
• CBLPI
• interview
• CSPAN
• controversial
• communist
• extremist
• whine
• whiny
• conservative
• Clare
• Boothe
• Luce
• Policy
• Institute
• Limbaugh
• Hannity
• O'Reilly
• speed

[TheEodtch]

You are fucking stupid. She was factual in all she said. You are beyond ignorant and even help prove her point.

[claton95]

Peace Monger?

[Nashhinton]

Great view. It's like I'm driving.

[mamyot1234]

1:14 - 1:25 Since when the hell is an Anarachist, Communist, and Liberal the same thing!? What the hell are they teaching you guys in Political Science classes over there!?!?!?

[Vykingthor97]

I don't know what make the Libs whine more, the fact the Ann talks over their heads, they don't understand her point for a few minutes after she says it, or the fact that she is correct.

[Chslosers]

@Retact John wilkes booth opposed the forced unionization of the south by the racist Lincoln who only joined up with the abolitionists and their viewpoints because it was the only way to win the nomination for his party as he was competing against douglas for the nomination. Most of what the civil war supposedly is , is a lie. Lincoln was a tyrant. John Booth was arrested once in the North for simply speaking out against Lincoln.. maybe that made him mad? Civil war wasn't about slavery.

[Retact]

@AryanBrother1

If Booth loved peace, why was he part of a conspiracy to restart the war? And, don't bother saying he wasn't. It is a widely known fact that he was.

You are write one point. I can't find a single quote from him stating that he is for slavery. If fact, I have done farther research on the matter and I now think he was in support of The South because of he supported States over Federal. (which is also a value shared by many modern Conservatives, so my point stands.)

[beerbrain420]

@AryanBrother1 Talk about "historical revisionism" OH "Aryan Brother." If Booth was so interested in merely "ending the war" as you claim, then he had no reason to shoot Lincoln. Lee's forces had already surrendered to Grant at Appomattox several days before. The fact is that Booth was hoping to throw the Federal government into turmoil to force a settlement favorable to Confederate terms. It was the political equivalent of a "hail mary" pass at the end of a football game.

[AryanBrother1]

@beerbrain420 I am not a fan of Coulter, however she is most certainly not insane as Booth was several times at the latter part of his career directly quoted as supporting peace and did in fact take part in discussions on how exactly to end the war....get that Not win or lose the war but to "end the war" which in and of itself makes him a proponent for peace. It is a historical fact. Educate yourself before making bold comments

[AryanBrother1]

@Retact Your dead wrong about Booth. He was an outspoken proponent for peace. He was quoted directly several times towards the latter part of his life mostly during the war itself as believing in peace. Study my good man. Booths actual views on slavery itself are completely vague. Nowhere is he directly quoted on that issue It is merely assumed by most that he is pro-slavery because of the assasination itself. And assumptions are just that. An opinion without facts is ignorant