Is Richard Dawkins Really Atheist?

Sure he is an atheist
But is he *really*?
In fact what he can't comprehend is this.
He says "that power" can't jump into existence spontaneously.
Did anyone claim such thing?any theist?
In fact we claim that there MUST have been some Power which does not have a beginning,for whom,the rules of the so called time don't mean anything.
And by his words at the end,"why did that Power hide Xself" we see he doesnt know anything good about the Islamic philosophy.
For such famous person who should know much about theistic views as well as his atheism,it must be a shame.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• richard
• dawkins
• atheist
• oxford
• delusion
• God
• blind
• watchmaker
• atheism
• selfish
• gene
• charles
• darwin
• genius
• root
• of
• all
• evil
• ancestor's
• tale
• devil's
• chaplain
• unweaving
• rainbow
• climbing
• mount
• improbable
• river
• out
• eden
• extended
• phenotype

[doaftheloaf]

ben stein has zero credibility.

furthermore, this "power" you claim, prove it exists.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

all the amazing intelligence in definitely the unconscious atoms-cells-organs-systems point to the source of this intelligence,I'd really like to prove it to you right now and also the divinity of Quran too and see you embracing "submission" (islam in arabic) but things just dont work that way,you as a soul,as a unique being outside of everything you see,need to wonder and look for the truth on ur own and only for urself

start from feeling respect to the reason of your existence whatever it is

[doGoNsIylbaborPerehT]

@ac0ustic69

Maybe you then should stop watching videos that are deceitfully edited by creationists in order to misrepresent what the person interviewed actually said.

[LDS4Life71]

I have a picture of Dick Dawkins face on my urinal.

[doaftheloaf]

@code641 and, of course, it's passed through many imperfect translations.

[doaftheloaf]

@HighFlyingDutchman if you know it, then presumably you can show it?

if it weren't for the damn bible you wouldn't believe any of this. of course you don't believe based on eyewitness accounts because that's not what the biblical accounts are.

[ZZzzzzzWhat]

"Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question" has already been debunked and it only persists on creatard channels like @JJjayco 's where ratting are disable and comments are cherry pick. Its very common on creatards, the most famous beign @shockofgod and @venumfangx but ironicly this kind of dishonest attitude only promotes to atheism. ppl are fed up with religious bias/dishonesty.

[ZZzzzzzWhat]

@doGoNsIylbaborPerehT yap, lying for jesus, mohamed or any monotheistic god/prophet. Creationism is a clear example that the ends justify the means. Creationists know their are lying, they never prove any of their claims, and they even join forces to promote this pseudo-science putting aside their religious differences.

[doGoNsIylbaborPerehT]

@doGoNsIylbaborPerehT

The other deceitfully edited video which has been spreading all over Youtube is the one where (allegedly) "Richard Dawkins stumped by creationists' question".

I guess lying for Jesus is okay then(?)

[doGoNsIylbaborPerehT]

Dawkins and PZ Myers discussing the "Expelled" movie:

watch?v=p86NEpo_Nj8

[doGoNsIylbaborPerehT]

@Fido1488

As people have been pointing out since Dawkins commented this extract from the film (a long time ago) he didn't mean that panspermia would be plausible. This has been taken out of the context on purpose.

(And actually the film producers lied about the nature of the film and basically cheated Dawkins to appear on it.)

[Fido1488]

This interview sounds like Dawkins is talking about ancient astronaut theory. Maybe he's the one who's hallucinating after all.