Extreme Dinosaurs - The Giants of Patagonia - Part 5
Top Comments
All Comments (63)
-
@AznNinja96 That's because the images they show are just recolors of the Walking With Dinosaurs Allosaurs.
-
those new giant meat eater looks like a giant allosaurus
-
@faisalindustry164u8 wait the dinosaur in part 5 was really bigger than giganotasaurus, didn't they say it was to big due to extra bones? if i'm wrong do you know its name yet?
-
@WayneWiblin As the film came out they found the Utahraptor, which fits the portrail in the film. Other Dromaeosauridae were even bigger, Achillobator seems to be 20ft long.
Interesting that every animal in the park was Cretaceous, not Jurassic.
-
There are other ways of hunting. A Kimodo Dragon will give you a quick nip, then follow you around for a week while you die of septicemia.
Are these carnivors taking live prey?
Whole eco-systems, lasting millions of years, and all we have are these tiny clues.
-
@olliemad Yes it is real but the movie Jurassic Park is still far from a perfect example of how Dinosaurs once were. Jurassic Park came out in 1993 and this video was made around 1995. The dinosaur in that movie that they called Valosaraptor did hunt in packs and live together but that dinosaur has another name because for the movie they just gave it the name Valosaraptor. The real Valosaraptor was just abit bigger than a turkey and had feathers.
-
so that large predator they discovered at the end was bigger than the 1st one, but it didnt seem that big compared to the tyrannosaurus. is that dinosaur from Jurassic park real ?
-
@TheLogankahle "how large predators behaved" i know why you are confused, the word large wasn't referring to the word how, it was referring to the word predators; read this: how 'large predators' behaved - get it, small predators, or large predators. he didn't mean large behavior, he meant large predators. i had to figure it out too LOL....
-
(in part 5) Given that currie says its too RARE to have been the result of a flood washout, and too co-incidental that only they, and no other species were found there. then WHAT could possibly have KILLED 12 tyrannosaurs (albertasaurus) all at the SAME TIME? I'm curious as to why he didn't present THAT as one of his questions. It certainly wasn't the meteor, that was a completely different time period. Does anyone have any idea what could have killed 12 of these ferocious beasts all at once?
Awesome vid, I still think of Tyrannosaurus Rex as the king.
That skull is something else. Allosaurs and ceretasaurs had fairly weak skulls. Tyrannosaurs skulls sturdy and thick.
Thulgore 2 years ago 13
I really like these vidéos! Very interesting!
Denden971 2 years ago 9