Why didn't WTC 5 collapse, or WTC 6 for that matter

No description available.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Why didn't WTC 5 collapse
• or WTC 6 for that matter

[unclesamsnephew666]

why did different buildings of different size and different shape constructed differently of different materials that suffered different damage not all react the same way?

what a stupid fucking question.

truthers are dumber than a bag of shit.

[wordgeezer]

@unclesamsnephew666 "why did different buildings of different size and different shape constructed differently of different materials that suffered different damage not all react the same way?" That is your question...mine is "why didn't 5 & 6 collapse?" My other one is "why would a stupid bag of shit want to be a debunker?" If you are obsessed with fornication, I would suggest that you get some internet security. If you are obsessed by feces there is no help for ya...G:

[unclesamsnephew666]

@wordgeezer

"why didn't 5 & 6 collapse?"

OK, the answer is: they were not damaged enough, given their unique attributes, to collapse.

seems pretty obvious, but there's the answer. now, I hope you'll answer my question.

is it logical to think that if different buildings of different size and different shape that were constructed differently of different materials were to suffer different damage, they should all react the same way?

[wordgeezer]

@unclesamsnephew666 No, it isn't logical. Is that what you think? That they should all react the same way? lolmao Why don't you consider the evidence.? If you are depending on your logic, you better look closely at the evidence.

Your ignorance is pathetic and your weird questions are beyond anything I've ever heard, not to mention that they are irritating and a complete waste of valuable time that i could use for seeking, yet more evidence...buzz off...G%.

.

[wordgeezer]

@RBAWilcox Obviously, but the heat energy and damage was far greater than the small fires in bldg, 7. In the case of bldg. 6 the center of the building was virtually melted clear to ground level. There was molten metal in all of the buildings at the WTC. Can you explain this with a simple answer?

[MarchOnTyranny]

That's true, How did WTC 7 collapse due to a few office fires yet these building didn't collapse at all? That's just strange to me.

[newsmanbluesman]

Am I missing the commenter who explains not the lack of collapse but the presence of fire? In what way can either tower collapse cause full-spread fire next door, with kerosene long expended? Likewise, no debunker explains WTC7 fire-start. Nor collapse. Which is minus kerosene - which to DB is, with hi aircraft speed, the key to both tower collapse explanations. WTC7 is no plane, no kerosene. Ron Avery idea: where bldgs are hinged at a single column and lintle - dont go in. Insurers: counter-sue

[Stringyheads]

WTC had the most server fire out of any that day. Why wasn't it reported in the news? If it was it was very brief.

[unclesamsnephew666]

@sh9683

"wtc5 was closer to the twins! it would have gotten MORE DAMAGE then 7"

specualtion. you are claiming certainty in a random event. ridiculous.

"5 is smaller less metal to melt had fires engulfing the entire building and being much hotter then 7"

if true (debatable), it still does not guarantee that it would collapse. you are attempting to make a certainty where you can't. it's not working. your appeal is emotional, not factual.

your description of 7's fire is laughable.

[sh9683]

@sh9683 *like

[sh9683]

@unclesamsnephew666 government sheeple (you) idiots dumber then "dumber then a bag of shit" i bet you cannot prove that it was al-queada (which was accused before investigations where complete) unless you turn to the commission report which is written by your lying government

[sh9683]

you guy sthinking its because its built differently or it was not damage enough, you guys ARE IDIOTS! wtc5 was closer to the twins! it would have gotten MORE DAMAGE then 7, 5 is smaller less metal to melt had fires engulfing the entire building and being much hotter then 7, (7 had smouldering fires except for maybe an equivalent of one floor spread out unevenly only on the south side) if it was fire wtc5 would not have been standing,

[sh9683]

@unclesamsnephew666 no theya where all steel structures, maybe this one woud not come lie a CD like the others but surely it would have been burned t the ground