Conspiracy Theory, Fact or Fiction, GMO Food, Seeds of Deception by Jeffrey M. Smith

Conspiracy Theory, Fact or Fiction, GMO Food, Seeds of Deception by Jeffrey M. Smith

The owner of Brave New Books discusses the book Seeds of Deception: Exposing Industry and Government Lies About the Safety of the Genetically Engineered Foods You're Eating by Jeffrey M. Smith.

The Big Food industry likes to talk about the advantages of GMO foods and claims that they are harmless but whats the truth? Whats the history of GMO and what are the potential risk?

For more Information visit the website;
http://www.seedsofdeception.com

Visit the Brave New Books Website;
http://www.bravenewbookstore.com

This video was produced by Psychetruth
http://www.youtube.com/psychetruth
http://www.myspace.com/psychtruth

Music by
Jimmy Gelhaar
www.jimmy.us

Copyright © Target Public Media 2010. All Rights Reserved.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• conspiracy
• theory
• fact
• fiction
• gmo
• food
• seed
• deception
• jeffrey
• smith
• brave
• new
• books
• psychetruth
• genetically
• modified
• engineered
• risk
• advantages
• history

[zephiloyd]

it depends who's facts you check. There is only one main conspiracy theory, this is that they (the global elite) want most of us dead. Other conspiracy theories are a part of this main one (except perhaps the moon landings). Conspiracy theories are becoming conspiracy fact. They have to find new ways of lying to cover their asses. We have to stick to the truth and we will win eventually.

[gilgamesh1962]

Isn't that amazing? now someone that is not even American, for example, someone from Saudi Arabia, who is part owner of a US corporation has more "say" over US policy than any regular working American citizen.

[Rina19081]

@stevin47 This is why preserving biodiversity is so important. This way we can produce enough food for a growing world population and can maintain healthy bees. However, I do disagree with most points in this video as research suggests that GMOs have no adverse effects and are just as nutritional as conventional food. The fact that you DONT need to use pesticides also only helps the bees.

[stevin47]

i got a question any help... does any one think seeds designed to only produce once and last longer and produce diff chems, might have any thing to do with the dying off of bee colonys.... the polon from these are their food ...

[dragonseptor]

@zephiloyd Amen bro!

[Elvception1979]

Sorry to bust ur bubble ... this may sound crazy but even the "moon landings" are apart of the grand agenda and Think about it for a minute how many satelites do we have in space rite now? tits for the weaponization of outer space its all apart of the grand scheme remember the global elites have been planning this for years. Their trying to create a prison planet and it started with the moon landings.

[xxeu4riaxx]

that angel at the end under the sun was freaky :O

and that owl loll...

[kikibortok]

GMO food is nothing more the a way to control food supplies like they did with oil.Patented seeds with the help of WTO = royalties and exclusivity.In short: it is a weapon to control the economy,the politics and the peoples with the menace of starvations if they dont cooperates.You disagree ? Then no seeds and foods!

[IronwillNeo]

guys . . really, only thing I really believe is that the guys with money dont give a shit if everyone else live or die. like someone that sell cocaine to others. he really dont care too much if the other person live or die as far as the others give him all the money before. the guys with money also think like that. if they can rise their money, their profits, they really dont give a shit to if we all live or die and how we live as far as they get their money.

[RandyBful1]

There's no "theory" involved. The corporations want to control the planet...and they have a really good head start!

[mechanicalbu11]

@dragonseptor immunize against pregnancy so you can catch a baby. this guy Bill Gates sees life (other then his own) as bad.

[doNOTvoteCAMPAIGN]

@jmeli99 I don't think you can write off carefully reported research as a 'crappy book'. You'd have to at least read it first and comment upon the contents, surely? Also, you need to learn another adjective.