lake of fire documentary movie revue abortion pro life choice

review of the controversial documentary lake of fire.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• film festival
• abortion
• abortion documentary
• life report
• pro life documentary
• pro choice documentary
• abortion debate
• abortion talk show
• pro life talk show
• pro life radio show
• pro choice talk show
• atheist experience abortion
• pro life argument
• pro choice argument
• planned parenthood argument
• planned parenthood debate

[Freng1410]

Alright, secondly Mr. Gershwitz's statement was correct because a child does actually have to accepted by their parents to become fully human. For a child to develop someone does have to decide they are human, it's human psychology. We need to be acknowledged as people, loved, given affection, offered guidance etc. Humans are social creatures and need these interactions for an entire part of their brain to develop, so you are wrong, at least for a far more complex reason.

[miggetymike1]

@Freng1410 You claim that a child is not fully human if not accepted by his/her parents. If the child is not fully human than what is it? What if a child is accpeted by one parent but no the other, is it 3/4 human? What is the other 1/4? This also means that for the first time in science history a human could become a non human simply by its parents deciding so. Interesting logic.

[leiapeison]

studies show outlawing abortion doesnt reduce the number of abortions either. in fact, countries where it is illegal have HIGHER rates with added maternal mortality. not to mention more child and infant abandonement. also just ignore that LifeReport. my friend and I made a response video awhile back to them and they false dmca"d it. they are cowards.

[miggetymike1]

that's a very bold claim. What is one of the studies you referenced that show outlawing abortion doesnt reduce the number of abortions?

[leiapeison]

the only relevant question is NOT whether it is human. no one has a right to leech off my body to sustain themselves. an elderly person is not using my organs. my sexual parts are mine and not for others to use born or unborn. we need to get better birth control so this issue can be put to rest.

[miggetymike1]

It's interesting that when deciding whether or not to kill something whether or not the thing is a human isn't important to you.

studies show that birth control education does not reduce the number of elective abortions.

[Craash950523]

¿Como llegué aquí?

[galerouth]

@t

"Parasites are organisms that live off of a host of another species."

HA! then what's a parasitic twin? face it, your science is based off of lies and that can be easily disproven by nature.

"it is also possible for a symbiotic relationship to exist between two organisms of the same species."

answers com/topic/symbiosis --–Gale's Science of Everyday Things:

Symbiosis

it depends on the doctor, even scientists back in Galileo's days didn't accept the earth wasn't the center of the universe.

[galerouth]

@t

actually, no ---you were mislead into believing that your pro-life, schizophrenic fascism trumps reality and law. no, it's not about questioning, because abortion is constitutional, thus protected by the 14th amendment's equal protection clause: "no human has a right to life by the use of another against their will and legal rights"...it's settled.

science already proved that any organism that invades, steal nutrients, and cause another organism harm IS a parasite, ergo the human fetus.

[tofuaddict1]

@galerouth Lookup "pro" and "forced" in the dictionary you will get 2 completely different definitions."Choice" can refer to the choice of friends, clothing, hobbies, etc. and nobody is arguing against that in an abortion debate. A debate isn't about the laws themselves, it's about questioning them. Those in favor of keeping abortion completely legal are pro-abortion and those that aren't are anti-abortion.

[tofuaddict1]

@galerouth Your debate was open for anyone to read and butt into, so that's exactly what I did. The structure of your comment was confusing so I asked for clarification.

Trophoplast cells explain how fetuses get nutrients from their mothers but that doesn't mean that science classifies them as parasites. Parasites are organisms that live off of a host of another species.

"...so your point is, if u have 1"-No, my doctor said that I didn't have any parasites.

[galerouth]

@t

'No. "Forced abortions" means "Forced abortions".'

you said that pro-choice was pro-abortion, which is not true, pro-choice is to support the reproductive freedoms of women...not pro-abortion, which is for forced abortion. "Should it be legal?" it is, so your point is? and "Then should the taxpayer pay for it or the individual seeking one?" no fed tax dollars pays for abortions, it's called the hyde amendment, but some states do pay for abortions, but that's with in their rights.

[galerouth]

@to

you butted into a debate that i had with mike, with your misreading of abortion law, that i had to explain to you what "not being forced means." and the second part, about fetuses being parasites, had nothing to do with the law, it's just a fact: google the function of trophoblast cells.

this is what i typed: it's clear that u can have a parasite like a tapeworm or a bot fly live just fine...so your point is, if u have 1?

to your response of pregnant women dying because of parasites.

[tofuaddict1]

@galerouth Your comment began with a law to support your view then you brought up a point stating that a human fetus was scientificallya parasite which I assumed was your next point and to finish you wrote"that's why you are not force to donate your kidney-the human fetus is no exception" which was separated from the rest of the text so I assumed it was a separate idea. Im pretty sure that science doesnt classify fetuses as parasites. As for your last point inyour reply no I don't have parasites