mick taylor blues

vidéo

• Category

  Music

[johngmart]

Um, ronnie may be a stone, but he can't carry MT's guitar strap. MT was basically forced out by the egos (perhaps justifiable) of the glimmer twins. But nothing was better than the Stones MT era - think about it : Sticky Fingers, Let it Bleed, Beggars Banquet, Only Rock and Roll, Goats Head Soup and Exile on Main Street vs. bridges to babylon and steel wheels. Only a fool would suggest the band got better when MT left.

[swiggeee]

Here's the bottom line, ya'll; (from a guitar player and Stones/Keef lover)....Mick T. and Keith were BOTH at their best when Mick was with the Stones; because they pushed and inspired EACH OTHER!!! Keith made MT reach Deeper than the standard 12 barre blues stuff. Keith has even admitted that their best records were done then. They were great together. MT inspired Keith and Keith pushed Mick to try harder. Great combo!

[202pdiddy]

In Wood's defense, he's playing very well of late. I don't know if it's because he's cut out the alcohol, but there's a noticeable improvement. His solos are actually pretty good.

[michaeljohnson626]

michael jackson movie

[xDeadMisfitsx]

Let It Bleed really wasn't a Mick Taylor era album. Also, It's Only Rock N Roll is the worst Stones album.

[dkstryker]

that fuckin sound in the begining is orgasmic from that les paul! really i just bought a les paul special double cutaway and Any Gibson Les Paul has that sort of tonation in it which is so desirable and you can only get that sound froma les paul! love it!

[jroxx11211]

your not kidding bro, i love it when you get 2 morons who think their opinion is the only one that counts, they just dont get it that its music, and everyone has different likes and tastes, no one person is better than anyone else, it kills me when they go on and on about who's right, like anyone really cares anyway. just dig the music and stop fuckin argueing!!!! ROCK ON!!!

[sepultribe666]

SRV's main influence was the blues, rock came 2nd, and then everything else, but he was not a blues player in the traditional sense. He had his own style, a fusion of many things such as blues/rock/funk/jazz etc. Just as Mick Taylor had his own style with blues and rock mixed in. You can call both of them blues-rock players, but SRV has got his blues side more prominent in his playing/writing and its the opposite for Mick, imo.

[nusdorfer]

@JDWnSRV so the hick is gettin racist... so THAT'S what u do when u lose an argument... okeydokey, mr americano

[PENTADACTYLON]

There are only 3 equal places on Olimpus Summit.

One for Jimi Hendrix, one for Jimmi Page,

and one for Mick Taylor.

Others guitar players sit on second row, awaiting...

[nusdorfer]

@JDWnSRV No matter where Im from, I sure write better english than u. And i guess you should listen to your kid because u become the dork arguing for no reason. im sure there are healthier options for retirement than trolling ppl w BS.

And what do you understand of blues anyway? Dont tell u know where the Delta is, cuz SRV brought blues to the media (i.e. fast soloing) , but u get hints from many old bluesmen on how they dont consider it genuine blues. Do your homework and leave me alone.

[nusdorfer]

@JDWnSRV I understand u love SRV - i get it. I like his stuff a lot and even listen way more to SRV.

But SRV aint about the blues. He's about rock-blues. u should've asked him while he was alive. Or his brother. He's got chops and cool licks. Not the same feel and good taste as Mick. U should open your ears, my music friend. Because Im the guy who listens to everything.