9/11 WTC South Tower 97th Floor Worker - Unusual Power Downs The Week Before
Uploader Comments (IranContraScumDid911)
All Comments (22)
-
Whether he is lying or not we can never be sure. We can only deal with what evidence we have. NIST and Fema did a GOD awful job in their investigation of the collapse and would make you believe that fire made the buildings collapse. Metal structures simply do not melt and collapse into dust indicating other modes of collapse. I link this vid (watch?v=_A9X_8flGeM) this is prior to the collapse of WT7 and tell me what you think.
-
@Mikester1200 Look you weren't there, Scott Forbes was so where is your credibility that proves he is lying? There are people who have backed Scott Forbes, one being Gary Corbett who worked for Fiduciary Trust. Just look him up on You Tube, his story goes more into detail about the power down. The power down affected mainly the computers and security systems at the WTC so it wouldn't have impacted the elevator to the observation deck. Instead of poking fun at Conspiracy Theorists open your eyes.
-
@Mikester1200 Why would he lie? Because he's desperate to get people like you to belive him? Probably not. It's a shame that so many people are unwilling to accept that many questions need to be answered & people need to be exposed for their crimes. I'm not someone who believes every conspiracy theory I hear but C'MON, These buildings where sabotaged, no doubt about that.
-
If the power was down that weekend, , then how could he work that weekend.?
Mr Scott here is lying their is proof of other witnesses against his claim he has no evidence proving him right, this man works at the 90th floor how would he know that exactly 40 floors below him (%50 of the building was powered down? Even more evidence is that observation tickets were given on these days which proves their had to be power a
Mikester1200 3 months ago
@Mikester1200 The fact the 1/4 mile high buildings turned to dust in 10 seconds would make this guys story more believable and likely than the official cavemen in the Himalayas story. Unless you have the observation tickets for 2:00am, then your theory does not prove anything.
IranContraScumDid911 3 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 lol conspiracy theorists changing the subject and not answering the question is typical :). One how does the building collapsing have to do anything with this guys story? Are you saying electricity causes buildings not to collapse? Second his claims this power don for was a much longer period then 2 am
Mikester1200 3 months ago
@Mikester1200 LOL at you, you are the conspiracy theorist, observation tickets you dont have, that can be easily forged after the fact, and are not available are your evidence that this guy is lying, and that a caveman in the Himalayas must have done it. Since the building is on branch circuits with subpanels, you can shut down parts and not all. The buildings were blown up and this guys story is backed by others, and what really happened. I will not even chase you down on the stupid 2am reply
IranContraScumDid911 3 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 Ok again your changing the subject and your not answering my question of what credibility does Scott have in this video? They only 911 conspiracy scum is you. Your comments just prove you have no evidence because you just keep changing the subject
Mikester1200 3 months ago
@Mikester1200 He is backed by other witness accounts and testimony. The rest of the story confirms. 9/11 is a big picture, every piece must fit the puzzle and still fit in reality, science, the evidence, and case study ... unified. It takes a simple minded troll to choose to debate such a stupid subject. The security dropped and dogs were removed because of the service being done in the building. This is funny, only a fool like you could not unify the science then examine the rest of the facts
IranContraScumDid911 3 months ago