Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Need for Speed Shift™ Gameplay on [PC]!!! Play on Q8200 GTX 295 all max HQ

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,015
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 19, 2009

Gameplay with gtx295, Intel Core 2quad Q8200 6Gb ram res. 1920x1080 22'

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @Cr1ptlord Q8200 is a terrible CPU. You may downrate me all you want, but it lacks virtualization, and it has 4mb of cache. In comparison, my Q9550 has 12mb of cache. An old E6600 dual core has 4mb of cache.

    It's a budget quad, and if you wanna game, you should go for a Q9550 if you want a quad, an E8400/8500 or 8600 dual.

    I'm ready for the hate, but every word is true.

  • q8200 and gtx295? the cpu is bottlenecking your gpu

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @DUSK4000 ....noob?

  • very nice

  • @Peemon OR, you go for a 9650

  • @darkstarsergio yah but when u get up to 12 cores if u runnin a simple game all the cores accessing the cache will slow the computer down...so if i'm playin old games that cant benifit from quad core I use my laptop which is dual

  • this game is noob the physic suck but he as good graphic

  • @asi97 q8300 always bro, today more cores is better, good bye to dual core days

  • i have a question, now i have an e5200, 2gig ram 1066mhz and a geforce 9600gt, i want to buy a new processor, can you help me,  wich one is better, a Core 2 duo E8400 or a core 2 quad q8300? the e8400 has a lot of technologies, but the q8300 has 4 cores but smaller cache PLS HELP!!!!

  • also virtualization? who gives a shit this is for playing games and general tasks this isnt a fucking server what the fuck do i or any of you need virtualization for? stop spending tons of money for fancy features you wont ever use.

  • lol you guys are morons. i ran a 2140@2.9ghz for 2 years with an x1950, then later a 4850, now im using a q8200 @2.8ghz and the same 4850 and i run all games maxed out on my 32inch lcd 1360x768. the 2140 had 512kcache per core and the q8200 has 1meg per core. i play my games just as fast as they run on your q9550 except i only paid $129 for my processor and you paid like $300+ lol.

  • @ECXVegetto

    what is this with bottlenecks? nvidia has much less bottleneck than ati, or so it seems in the future of cards. 2.33 ghz may be underpowering, but those will go a little faster. fast enough for that 295 im sure!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more