Michel Chossudovsky | 011409 Public Lecture "The Global Financial Crisis" 4/8
Loading...
1,653
Loading...
see all
Video Responses
This video is a response to Michel Chossudovsky | 011409 Public Lecture "The Global Financial Crisis" 5/8
Loading...
@bobbygnosis AFAIK the "Israelites" - far from being a separate ethnic group and having exited from Egypt - were merely a "lower caste" if you will, living in the mountaineous regions, within the Kanaaites which gradually took over as the ruling class of Kanaan degnerated who in turn would be ancestors of the Palestinians ?
LooksAeterna 2 years ago
I wouls also say that the Ashkenazi can certainly be distinguished from the Palestinians on a genetic level (look into Khazaria, by the way). The distinguishing word is "Sephardic." If you look at the average Ashkenazi in Israel or Palestine you will note that they are different from the Sephardic and the Palestinians. The Sephardic, genetically, have more in common with the Palestinians and this is obvious from photos.
Not alll Ashkenazi are Jewish.
Confusing, but true.
Peace.
bobbygnosis 2 years ago
The Ashkenazi are just as distinguishable as any other group. There have been lots of racist cartoons about it. I'm not advocating racism, mind you, but I am noting that they are loosely distinguishable - just as you can kinda tell a Korean from a Japanese.
I can't say this enough: I'm looking at the historical record of Khazaria. When Gengis Khan took over the Caspian Sea the Khazars moved west - into Germany. This is where we get Ashkenazi.
Look it up.
bobbygnosis 2 years ago
I see what you're saying and it is compelling. However, I would still go with Ashkenazi on etymological grounds. The root word for Jew is Judah. That is religious. They, genetically, are Ashkenazi. Ashkenazi is a mixture of the Turcic peoples of Khazaria and white peoples of Germany.
As I say - I understand what you're saying. I just think this is a confusing topic to a lot of people (me too) and I wish the language was less confusing. That is my motivation.
Peace.
bobbygnosis 2 years ago
@bobbygnosis That isn't a fitting term either since Ashkenazi only serves to denote "Jews from Germany". While this may be largely fitting for the ethnic group of Jews living in the US today, it is unfitting for denoting the genetic identity of Jews.
I would doubt there is any such identity since they cannot be successfully distinguished from the other semitic groups, IMO, especially the Palestinians.
"Jewish" is OK. "Judaist" would be religious.
LooksAeterna 2 years ago
I disagree with the use of the word "Jewish" in that I don't believe that these guys read the Torah much less follow the teachings therein. They would be more properly characterized as "Ashkenazi." They are genetically central Asian. To be specific Judaism is a beliefset - not a genetic code. They are not Jews. They are Ashkenazi. A subtle, but important distinction.
That said, I totally agree that the bankers are assholes and out to be thrown out on their ears.
Peace.
bobbygnosis 2 years ago
Federal Reserve and Canadian central bank are private banks controlled by Jewish bankers in Europe, not by your gov't in USA and Canada.
tyoungos 2 years ago
The bottom line : Illuminati bankers want everyone to be their debt slaves in accepting their bullshit paper money. When people owe their money, they are naturally under their control. When they can't pay back, they are forced to sell their assets to raise money, like during the global financial crisis which Illuminati bankers create. That is, they create/supply their bullshit paper money (intangible) out of thin air in exhange of people's hard-earned assets (tangible). How smart!
tyoungos 2 years ago