Oceans, Creation and the Genesis Flood
Uploader Comments (BereanBeacon)
All Comments (57)
-
Hi @BereanBeacon,
I had hoped, you could answer my question about how creationism explains the pattern of fossils in the rock layers. I suppose, this is the end of creationism then? I too, was looking on all the creationist websites and an answer to this question was nowhere to be found.
I was also trying to find an answer to the question: If the universe was only 6,000 years old, why then can we see stars, that are farther away? I guess, the bible is not God's word, after all.
-
So, if the "big flood" did not kill fish, only land creatures: Then why did all the dinosaurs living in the water die out too? I am very disappointed by this movie. Nothing mentioned here is doing more, than confirming the theory of evolution.
-
Never found a missing link? Ardipithecus was a creature that was walking upright, obviously something between a monkey and a human being. To deny, that there are no transitional forms is like saying that there are no dinosaur fossils. Natural selection has a very limited aspect? Proof? The bible certainly is a "supernatural" book. "supernatual" means "ignorant". The book of Genesis was written by someone who was there? Really? Because the book says so?
-
Yes, scientists have to be secular, or they wouldn't be unbiased. Imagine, how it would hamper science, if they had to assume, that earth was only 6,000 years old from the start. And yes, people believe, that the earth is round and turns around the sun. Not because, they do not want to believe in a creator, but because science has proven it to be so. Creationists need yet to prove, that evolution is limited to micro evolution.
-
@1:40 'If it's 72% water...' NO DUMMY. The earth is mostly ROCK. It is just covered by 72% of the surface in water.
Water is not unique to earth, the origin of our water is from outer space.
Darwin explained evoluton, not creation ''without god''.
I can't listen to this ID-iot any more.......
-
@BereanBeacon No one says ''nothing exploded''. It was an expansion of space-time. You are still made of ''Non-living chemicals'
-
Perhaps they have it backwards and the sumarian story comes from Genesis. Not directly now. Presuming that there was a Noah and a world-wide flood that killed everyone, but this man, his 3 sons and their wives. Then every ancient civilization that came after them would have some sort of story about a flood and life being saved from that flood. And we do have such information. There are flood storys found in areas all over the world. Naturally as people get father from the true story it devolves.
-
the genesis story of the bible is taken from the sumarian epic stories. re: atheist vs. creationist, it's plausible that the truth is somewhere in between. evolution is quite probable but there were beings(that were highly evolved and technologically superior) that experiment with the homosapiens.
"Something exploded from nothing and here you are. Non-living chemicals got together and here you are again."
While that may sound improbable (esp. the way you explain it) it sounds considerably more plausible than the fairy story in Genesis.
Please keep posting these videos. The truth will set you free one day.
markjeppo 3 years ago
Perhaps these will help.
The Bible and Science - w w w (dot) youtube (dot) com/watch?v=6YhCJ66KQSQ
Fossils -
w w w (dot) warneveryone (dot) com/fossils dot h t m
BereanBeacon 3 years ago
I'm still shocked that anyone can take this stuff seriously. Welcome to frontal lobotomy time!
markjeppo 3 years ago 2
Something exploded from nothing and here you are. Non-living chemicals got together and here you are again.
BereanBeacon 3 years ago