Satyajit Ray's - Shatranj Ke Khilari - Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
29,008
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 12, 2009

Movie : Shatranj Ke Khilari

Director : Satyajit Ray

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • this movie particularly did not get oscar , but Ray did. and danny can not come close to Ray

  • Oscar award is inferior since its inception.Why bother about that sort of recognition.

see all

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @5:00 "doesn't leave him much time for his concubines, not to speak of the affairs of state..." ...dry wit at its best...

  • What a great acting by Sir Richard Attenborough...mind blowing!!

  • Munshi Prem Chand key ek kahani "Shatranj Kay Khilari" per Satayajit Ray ney ek Film banay "Shatranj kay Khilari" jo kay asly Kahani say kosoun door hay yeh film salon box may band pari rahi kisi bhe Distibuter nay asko nahy pasand kyia, Amitabh bachan nay apnay risk per is Film ko relese karwaya jo kay ek floop fim sabit hoy, jo log awadh key History kay jankar thy yuhou nay is fil ko reject kar dyia kyoun kay yeh film kalpana per adharit thy

  • excellent...don't get it why tht officer general whtever was soo amazed abt concobines...didn't thy hav kings who used to hav concobines in hundreds...

  • @6:52 is interesting. Weston is struck with disbelief, amazement, grief, unwarrantedness.

    I feel that he had soft corner for the king...

  • @blurr

    and FINALLY the British Raj Rule of India must not be dismissed as the rule of "just another invader in a long line of invaders" because they are back in the region, militarily with 10,000 troops in Afghanistan and military advisors in Pakistan.....doing exactly what the East India Company were doing harvesting Heroin/Opium out of that wretched country, under the pretext of fighting "terrorism".

  • @blurr

    and its people...separate clubs; social networking...whereas you will find the previous invaders integrated and mixed with Indian society extensively at all levels, to the point of losing their original identity.

  • @blurr

    and took the loot to London, turning it into a magnificent city. 3) Killed 30 million Indians through sheer greed and mismanagement ......no other "invader" has achieved such numbers 4) Accentuated the division of Indian society far more sharply...under "divide and rule". 5) Created an inferiority complex within the Indian Anglocised elite, through the Maclauey Doctrine which still adversely affects the leadership and governance/government of South Asian countries 6) They had a loathing

  • @blurr1000

    India over 3,500 years has been invaded by many races such as the Aryans from Central Asia, Persians, Greeks, Kushans, Saka, White Huns, the Turkic/Afghans, BUT unlike these invaders from the near abroad who assimilated and became Indians.......15% of Indians have Iranian genes....Raj Kapoor et al, 1) The British never assimilated into Indian society, unlike the above 2) They looted the country systematically...$1--2 trillion worth of Indian assets.

  • @blurr1000

    Granted that this is a casual sight where we post without much care to detail and actual facts, but I must correct you on the fact of India's overall wealth pre- East India Company/Raj colonialism (1757--1947). India in 1750 was the second richest nation on earth (China number 1) accounting for 25% of manufacturing in the world.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more