ALTA's Anne Anastasi Testifies Before the Financial Services Subcommittee

Anastasi's message states that in order to help consumers understand costs associated with obtaining a loan, mortgage disclosures should include accurate itemized estimates of costs allowing consumers to receive a complete view of their transaction. She also says that mortgage disclosures should encourage consumers to make informed choices that are in their financial interest; rather than prejudicing consumers against considering services or products such as Owner's Title Insurance by using loaded terms such as "not required."

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• alta
• title insurance
• respa
• title
• insurance
• mortgage

[dcipa]

3. Federal regulations such as those promulgated under RESPA for the Good Faith Estimate are specifically targeting specific types of transactions and meant to disclose to consumers those costs which lenders impose so that consumers can make good decisions about which lender and which loan program they select. This document is not meant to be a tool for the selling of owner title insurance. The phrase "not required" contains two simple, easy to understand words. I think consumers get it.

[dcipa]

2. Owner title insurance is a product that protects the buyer and is rightly, in my view, a product purchased on behalf of the buyer, just like the home warranty. It makes perfect sense to place this cost on the buyer side of the Settlement Statement and simply have the seller credit funds to cover the costs if that is the custom or how the contract was negotiated. The inability of the industry to adjust to a different form of disclosure says more about the industry than the document..

[dcipa]

1. If ALTA believes what Ms. Anastasi says about the important function of a title insurance agent at the closing table, why does ALTA take no stand against the use of notary signing agents who are not employees, likely not licensed and even more likely not well trained, if at all?