300 Spartans Vs 3000 Romans
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (4,824)
-
LOL you're comparing the Persian Army to the Roman Army? The Romans were centuries ahead of the Persians in terms of organisation training and tactics compared to the Persian army at Thermopylae. Also, the Spartans didn't defeat the Persians, they lost the battle.
-
It's the battle of Stirling Bridge all over again
-
why no upgrades on romans
-
all i could see was the lag from your shitty computer, dont move the camera around so damn much
-
@vinicuseduardo3 o nome do jogo é rome total war ...se kizeh mais detalhe da 1 toq ae ou manda msn :)
-
too bad they don't look like the great spartans from the time when Greece was a grand empire
-
que jogo é esse?
-
@thethirdwinter you realize historically 300 spartans defeated around 100000 of the persion army..... so this is pretty accurate.
-
The music and the sound of this game is soooo epic ! :D
-
nice xD
2:52 haha dat looks wrong
Fucku856 4 days ago 84
Here's the problem with your sim: It isn't historicly accurate at all. The Romans smashes Sparta on a whim. The Roman legion outmatched the Spartan phalanx. On a one on one match up the Spartan warrior outmatches most soldiers in history. However in the real world, combat isn't one on one, nor fought on one bridge.
thethirdwinter 4 days ago 6