Milton Friedman on Libertarianism (Part 2 of 4)
Top Comments
All Comments (615)
-
what about the air? for fuck sakes people, there 30 million people in california, that 30 million people to decide what about the air. you dont need 1 person in washington to decide what 30 million people want their air to be like. fuck, liberals and their regulation bullshit. like they forget what their own voice can do.
-
Milton Friedman and race
-
@skydark The Left has lifted the liberal moniker from us I believe just to spite us. Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers used the term liberal and liberty many times, when did Engels or Marx or any of the early Socialists ever use it? I'd be interested to know. They don't want liberty and the liberal philosophy, they want complete control.
-
@RestAssuredDrummer I should have viewed the vide on those terms, I guess I need to stop thinking of interviews and lectures as actually giving an in-depth knowledge of the issues I want to learn about, but rather a superficial glance in order to spark an interest. I admit, I was to judgmental. What book would you recommend me to read by Friedman? I'm not an economist, but I have a knowledge of math, so I think I would be able to read his works on a technical level.
-
@astroboomboy i believe the purpose of this interview was at least partly to familiarize people who had not read Friedman's books with his views - to give them a taste of what was in them so they could decide whether they were interested in reading them or not
-
Friedman is Libertastic!
-
This interview is terrible, the questions are not challenging at all, and all the answers are subjects that Friedman had written about in his books. A good interviewer would really challenge his position so that someone with a different framework could be convinced, and not just a group of libertarians petting each others shoulders.
@Porojukaha "We should no longer call them liberals, we should call them pinkos or commies"
Wouldn't go that far, but certainly social-democrats...which, like communism, doesn't work, but it does take longer to show its nefarious effects.
skydark 9 months ago 24
@NateC0le "Isn't one of the strong incentives for drug companies to sell rigorously tested drugs the very existence of the FDA?"
Yes. However, Constitutionally speaking, It should be a State Power, not a FED GOV power.
evolutionist101 2 months ago 2