Top Comments
All Comments (18)
-
I don't recall one single instance of you showing me real evidence of any inaccuracies. You "pity the writers"? Sounds very negative. YOUTUBE please note this online harrassment againt me.
-
Is that so? So then Mr Silverman why do you use at least three different names, but whine when that name is used to address you? Bizzaro.
No disappointment here Phil, just frustration that having your obviously huge ego fed is more important to you than accuracy. I pity the writers of "bios., reference books, etc.," who have been misled into thinking that you have any credibility outside of your own head.
-
I am always contacted by my real name; I am always cited, in bios., reference books, etc., by my real name. Don't mean to disappoint you.
-
Doubtless many people many have acknowledged your amateurism, 'published authors' or not.
I wonder if you "get contacts" because you use so many different names to post or because the sheer volume of your recycled twisted and confused 'information' which then becomes misleading' intentionally or not means it is likely to stick ? Like....mud.
-
There are many published authors who have acknowledged my amateurism in their works; also a good number of radio show fans in New Jersey and New York.
My information is so misleading that I get contacts from all over the world for my opinion. I know, secretly, they laugh at me. They print my name just to enhance the names of the credible musicologists.
YOUTUBE please note continuous personal attack on me by "SimonW" via your vaunted medium.
-
Wow, what a "bizarro" response !
Any credible 'avid researcher' HATES your kind of misleading, amateur (your use of the word "educated" is laughable) speculation.
Your ill informed misleading post has no value at all and can only serve to confuse. Sadly, there's another guy appearing under different names on the net doing exactly the same thing regards Little Richard and ruining everything his badly written posts appear on.
-
I thought you had mellowed - but you are back to the obviously fetishistic online harrassment. YOUTUBE note abuse of privilege by "SimonW".
-
Quote -
"there is very little in the way of Vee Jay session files"
That's the first thing you got right in ages, Phil.
-
Means something for avid researchers because it was known that Hendrix would team up with Don and Dewey at the time. It's been written that Hendrix first filled-in with Richard's band as early as March, 1963.
Added to that, to my knowledge, there is very little in the way of Vee Jay session files so all we have is this kind of educated speculation to go along with what we can hear. I can hear Hendrix on things like "Money, Honey" by LR.
But thanks for more bizarro nitpicking!
-
Possibly? Means nothing then.
Mmmmm real music babe n_n
mikelremmerswaal 1 year ago 5
Thank you so much - this is my fav little richard song of all time - and I have never seen it on youtube !! It might be my favorite song next to "please please please" by james brown !! - great work
znerdybirdy 2 years ago 4