Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Irish282, Updownmostly, YTV, the DMCA and Censorship

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,055
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 17, 2007

Irish282 advises people to use the DMCA as a tool to get videos that they consider death threats or slander removed..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJJ2Epfp1Jc

This is a bad strategy and it is an abuse of copyright law to censor videos that contain information and allegations that you would rather not have others see. If you are legitimate and have nothing to hide then a far better strategy would be to stand your ground and tell the truth. Use evidence and logic to dispute the evidence that your "haters" bring to the table.

I give an example of how this can be done. In the following video, Amigacam alleges that Updownmostly's subscriptions, along with other evidence, provides sufficient reason to believe Updownmostly is a pedophile.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gNlC8s6Bjc


Yet, when put in perspective, Updownmostly's subscriptions to children's channels might not be that sinister. Updownmostly subscribes to nearly 900 people and is not at all discriminating in who he subscribes to. Updownmostly made a video describing the philosophy driving his subscriptions in this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd0G4KRWQuE

Subscribing to say 30 or 40 children is a huge red flag if you have only 60 subscriptions. It is not as large a red flag if you have 900 subscriptions. Perhaps Updownmostly subscribes to a disproportionate number of children, but that isn't the impression I got when taking a VERY QUICK look at his subscriptions. Someone with more time than I have might want to look through his subscriptions more closely and determine just how many children he subscribes to. Then we can see what percentage of his subscriptions are to children's channels and use this as evidence in deciding whether or not he is likely to be a pedophile.

The point is, if you are truly innocent then you are better off presenting evidence in your favor, rather than using the DMCA to censor videos questioning your character. When you use the DMCA to suppress your opponent's videos then you are admitting you can not win without censorship. This is a big red flag.

5UB5373N's made a video on Irish282 and Updownmostly that is vulnerable to a DMCA takedown notice because it uses video clips of others to make his point.

http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?s=94ifuH3j5VI

5UB5373N's use a video clips falls within Fair Use, but that will not protect it if someone files a DMCA complaint against it in order to get the evidence it presents flushed down an Orwellian Memory Hole.

Mike Skehan also made a video that is highly relevant to this topic and that is well worth watching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRE4-7NUWj4

  • likes, 159 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (86)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 0_o

  • Now that's a lot of comments flagged as spam

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more