Dolly Parton re Gays, Race and Tolerance (LOVE her!)
Uploader Comments (lgbtTV4)
Top Comments
-
@AshMbrs1 wrote "I doubt you studied the Bible whatso ever. You have no facts"
---
The Plague, Holocaust, Crusades, Inquisition, and world poverty are not historical facts? Get an education. Duh. Let's see ... I provided biblical QUOTES and actual historical facts, and you provided nothing. Why don't you ask any academician, including theologians, which is more convincing. hahaha
Get an education. And learn to think critically. What a sad sad sad joke. hehehe
-
3) "Those who are slaves must consider their masters worthy of all respect, so that no one will speak evil of the name of God and of our teaching. Slaves belonging to Christian masters must not despise them, for they are their brothers." (1 Timothy 6:1-2). So Harriet Tubman and other abolitionists were sinners?
4) And sexual slavery of young girls is okay! (Exodus 21:7) (Gen 19:5, 19:8). So CONSENSUAL sex among ADULT MEN is wrong but sexual slavery of minors is fine?
All Comments (70)
-
@NumberOneCollegeFan Look at it scientifically. Homosexuality is found in over 1,500 species; Homophobia is found in only one. Which do you think God will find more unnatural? God didn't make the mistake of making homosexuals. Man made the mistake of rewriting the Bible to twist God's words into hateful scriptures. You're entitled to your opinion and, frankly, neither of us will know until judgement day. My God is one that I know to love me and want me to be happy. THAT'S what the Bible tells ME
-
@LuvDatLaDiDa Twist the word all you want. That's all you're doing. Read Genesis 2:22-24. If you claim to know your religion than there is no denying that man and woman are designed to be together and anything different than that is lust, is immoral, is against God's design, and is therefore a sin.
-
@NumberOneCollegeFan Do not spout passages at me. I know my religion. If you read that thoroughly, it says that the shameful act is giving up the natural for LUST. I cannot speak for lustful homosexuals, but I myself as a MORALLY SOUND HOMOSEXUAL can say that I act on love, not lust.
Homosexuality in itself is not a sin.
Lustful abandonment of the natural, however, is.
-
@LuvDatLaDiDa Homosexuality is absolutely sexual immorality. "For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due." Romans 26-27
Homosexuality is without a doubt immoral, and is a sin.
-
@NumberOneCollegeFan Sorry about the grammatical error at the beginning of the post I just made. I had to shorted what I said because of the character limit and forgot to correct what I'd fixed.
-
@NumberOneCollegeFan The Sodom wasn't destroyed because of the act of consensual homosexual sex, they were destroyed because the people Sodom raped travelers. There is a similar story in the book of Judges, only this time it involved a female. The point of these stories is to describe the sin of sexual immorality--that does not include homosexuality. You would know that if you looked up the biblical definition of 'sexual immorality.' Looks like YOU need to learn how to read the Bible, my friend.
-
@lgbtTV4 Gen 19:5, you misused that verse terribly. The people that desired to have sex with those men were DESTROYED by God. The entire city was destroyed and only Lot and his two daughters survived. 19:8, if you actually understood the context you would realize that Lot was corrupted by his environment and that the Bible does not at all condone Lot's actions. You need to learn how to read the Bible my friend. You also need to learn what the points of each book of the Bible is are.
-
@lgbtTV4 You fail to recognize the context in which different passages of the Bible are written. There is a reason why Jews won't eat pork, but it is completely fine for Christians to eat pork.
-
@lgbtTV4 That is his wife. His wife is not Martin himself. Preventing "gay marriage" is not a threat to justice. Y'all being unable to see each other in hospital and crap like that is. Take your civil unions and quit trying to get marriage. A man and a man or a woman and a woman can NEVER be married.
I have a hard time believing that a pastor with such a strong faith would condone "gay marriage".
Martin Luther King Jr wouldn't want 'gay marriage'.
NumberOneCollegeFan 1 week ago
@NumberOneCollegeFan
His wife Coretta Scott King supported gay marriage and she carried his legacy, so unless you have proof, I'll extrapolate from her. She said, ""Gay and lesbian people have families, and their families should have legal protection, whether by marriage or civil union. A constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages is a form of gay bashing and it would do nothing at all to protect traditional marriages."
What's your proof?
lgbtTV4 1 week ago
@NumberOneCollegeFan
"I still hear people say that I should not be talking about the rights of lesbian and gay people. But I hasten to remind them that Martin Luther King Jr. said, ‘Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.’ I appeal to everyone who believes in Martin Luther King Jr.’s dream, to make room at the table of brotherhood and sisterhood for lesbian and gay people."
-- Coretta Scott King
lgbtTV4 1 week ago