Garmin Oregon 300
Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
You're a jurk !!! We would like to watch the maps.
-
I get your point I am sure in the next generation of Garmin they will need to implement 32 bit architecture to take their devices to a new level.
-
Yes I know about the update.
Still way behind in technology compared to other mobile electronics.
The twonav adventura is a 32 bit, and so is the Sony PSP. It's not that outrageous to expect an up to date computer in a mobile GPS.
-
A 32 bit processor in a hand held GPS? Come on ArtyFarty your reasoning is way out of the woods and YES the Garmin can handle raster maps and that is on a 16 bit processor. All Garmin did was issue a firmware update. Do you know how much more power a 32 bit versus a 16t bit uses? Check it out!
-
music is strange. it would be nice to hear what you have to say.
-
well focused map and I love how you navigate menus. Now, if only we could see what you are navigating to--way out of fucos. How about some actual use where you have that map to? you know...in the map screen? Who cares about the menus!
-
I love the 60CSx, but I do like the touch screen of the Oregon. I may do a side by side comparison.
-
No Garmin GPS at all.
You know there are cheaper 32 bit handheld game consoles with much faster processors right?
Garmin are still selling stone age computers that should have been buried twenty years ago.
Anything that can do raster maps would be relatively up to date.
-
Interesting comment. On that basis, which GPS would you recommend, bitwise I mean?
-
Yeah, it's rugged, bit it's an 8 bit computer.
Not exactly today's technology.
Neither is the 16 bit Oregon realy.
lol, sounds as a porn with that music in the background ^^ I'll get that device, lets see if I will be happy with it...
bahutu 2 years ago 5