Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Comparison of Water in Magnetic Versus Non Magnetic MoeJoe

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
29,940
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 8, 2007

In this video, a very clear observation can be made of the quality and dirtiness of the water being charged by two different Moe-Joes. One is using only 316L stainless steel, and the other is using some magnetic 304 stainless steel. The results are obvious.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (MosheDan9)

  • I can't entirely tell the principles behind this experiment, but I CAN tell that you are one cool dude. props for the interesting stuff

  • @kowalityjesus

    thanks my friend. it's nice to have a kind comment amidst all the aggressive ones. i appreciate it. if you want to learn more, do a search for moe joe cell with google. my site is first.

  • lol that cute doll look like ienstine

  • @narcovice

    yes! His name is Albie (for Albert Einstein)

  • A good test is to use the same metals, but magnets for one and not the other. Different metals react differently as such with water and electricity. So again use same kind of metals for both,,then magnets with one and not the other. If you get the same results as you think you have here,,you will be correct. Never use two different metals relating to electricity and water experiments as you will get different reactions thus different results.

  • that's my point. and it's not magnets that are used. it is steel that has magnetism vs steel that does not. they're both pretty much the same metals, relatively, just one does carry a magnetism and the other does not.

see all

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 304 SS is a lower grade than 316.

    Its the rust cummin from 304.

  • cool story bro

  • @asianepiphany its a video on youtube dude chill the fuck out

  • @MosheDan9

    This experiment is utter garbage. Why? First, there are several variables to your experiment:

    Steel alloys- steel can have numerous elements added to it, and just saying steel can mean scrap steal or something like virgin CPM-s30V. So, thats junk.

    number of spheres

    Second of all, your experiment is not translucent, meaning the steps are all not shown. For this to be even remotely valid, someone needs to know how this was done, and be able to replicate it.

  • some metals may have imperfections in it. hence the reason you have dirty water. when you add electricity to metal depending on the type of metal you you could get a HO which is Hydrogen and Oxygen production. depending on how many cells you have to positive vs negative. so really what you have here is Electrolysis machine. which if you take a match to the top of that it should pop. or burn :P.

  • @theandyman05 if you can find 304L S/S it is very similar but less prone to corrosion

  • 304 S/S rusts more quickly in a corrosive environment than 316 S/S

  • lol dirty, dirty, yellow, yellow. im gonna start using that.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more