Get a Mac ad with Gisele Bundchen

Get a Mac ad with Gisele bundchen

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Apple
• Mac
• Gisele
• Bundchen
• model

[w33zlmusic]

Hi. I'm a Mac Humvee.

Starting from $9,000,000,000,001

[TheTwistedTraceur]

that looks very proffesional right

lol

[DuallyDieselFord]

SO TRUE! hahaha

[AndrewDeLong]

@g0rsk13g4n9st4 Actually, to be fair, Premiere Pro does allow for some flexibility in resource allocation. Granted,, it's only with RAM right now, but at least they've put forth an effort. Truthfully, the only reason Adobe products are 64-Bit is due to OS constraints involving RAM. 32-Bit is quite limiting in that arena.

And yes, Premiere Pro is otherwise resource intensive, but, much like AVID, it's becoming more GPU based than anything, so it kind of has to be.

[Deathslayer156]

Thumbs up if Inside Gaming brought you here/

[g0rsk13g4n9st4]

@MaestroDraven Maybe it's because it's a 64bit only application. I guess Adobe doesn't bother improving it's efficiency because they know that the customers who use it run desktop setups that don't lack in power, and could care less about resource usage.

[MaestroDraven]

@g0rsk13g4n9st4

Premiere is a hog, yes. That's my only gripe. Why, I'm not entirely sure. I justify it via the options it gives me. Avid is industry-standard. To be honest I've never used it extensively, but most movies and TV shows use it.

[g0rsk13g4n9st4]

@MaestroDraven Never tried "Avid", I'll definitely take a look into it. I've only used Premiere Pro on someone's Mac Pro but it seemed to use 2x the resources as FCP and it took around the same amount of time to finish the task. I've only used the Windows version of Premiere Pro on my desktop so I don't have a valid comparison for laptops.

[MaestroDraven]

@g0rsk13g4n9st4

Avid and Premiere Pro CS5, my friend. I use Premiere myself. It does everything Final Cut does, and some things it doesn't. Complex, but for a reason. There's nothing you can't accomplish. But After Effects, no, no. Don't try to gauge comparisons using that. That's not its function.

[g0rsk13g4n9st4]

@MaestroDraven Well, those are the two advanced video editors I currently own licences to, so I can't compare otherwise. Even so, I've yet to encounter a piece of video editing software that is as efficient as Final Cut Pro on either OS X or Windows.

[MaestroDraven]

@g0rsk13g4n9st4

It does depend on OS, too. Right now, OSX and Windows 7 are pretty much identical in many ways. OSX loses out at heavy rendering, but has a slight advantage with desktop multitasking, for instance. I parallel OSX on my machine to stay informed and educated. To me, it's too cramped and narrow-ended for my tastes. I prefer an expandable list of options to customize everything with. So in that regard, yes, I do realize what you mean, exactly.