Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Making Meaning of the World: A Cosmotheandric Inquiry (response to VenomFangX)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
752 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 19, 2012

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Matthew, hi. I feel like i need to do a lot of catching up to contribute to this dialogue but i would like to start participating by asking you. what could i read to learn more about my judeo-christian myths and that type of stuff?

    what do you think of the aztec religion.

  • watch?v=N6HNx-i0KLs

  • Brilliantly stated! 

  • Scientific thinking asks some pretty big questions: What's the cause, the origin, the reason, the rational reason?...afterall isn't It a rationally real universe in the first place...or so i lead myself to believe in my scientific worldview. But what of purpose to this now and into a so-called future. What of my personal existential condition which defies systematic reasoning? Science remains moot to purpose and meaning of Life. It's rather up to me and my spark of divinity.

  • @ContraPoints "To Dawkins et al., religious people are just really bad (irrational) scientists." Ironic considering Dawkins's status. (Oxford apostrophe rule lol) Scientists who have firmer grasp of the physics which underlies Biology see Dawkins not only as irrational, but ignorant of natural law. It's not rational of a scientist to ignore empirical truth such as the implications of the photon-spin entanglement on perceptual mechanisms- the most damaging reductive error.

  • I try to engage you with an alternative view. Challenging your exclusivity of the 'literally irrational' with your 'authorial clinging to rational articulation' as cherry picked there & there without here. Yet "my way" as retort, neg-authoritarianism, involution & the drop of the 'serious' to that of the "mean& rude antics in the theatric" as palimpsest upon cosmos as divine & cosmos as dead binary. Yet you exclude thisme

    You are silent and like VFX responds not to you you respond not to me.

  • There is no doupt in my mind that the Atheistic movement is a necessary force in the world. However, as a world conception it is like a bird that is flying from a land of old to a distant and new land. When it arrives in this new land it will be unable to rest on firm ground unless it realises within its own essense the seeds of its destruction.

  • The reason dogmatic materialists think all religious people are irrational is that they can't get far enough outside their own way of thinking to see how someone with different presuppositions could articulate a theology in a way that is "rational." To Dawkins et al., religious people are just really bad (irrational) scientists.

  • Most western Christians have taken the divine out of theology, in both it's verb and noun usages. They do not divine and they seek not the divine. Therefore their divinity has been lost. Anyone arbitrating true Cleromancy becomes suspect vis broken dogma and hence most Christian Clerics are in essence... frauds.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more